Liggett blushes

[Jay Hill]

After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
"that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

 

[Stu Fleming]

Jay Hill wrote:
>
> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote ...

Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat
as "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.

Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
<place>", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.

 

[G.T.]

"Stu Fleming" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jay Hill wrote:
>>
>> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
> be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
> professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote
> ...
>
> Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat as
> "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.
>
> Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
> statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
> <place>", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.

I'd apply addition 2 to just Phil, not both.

Greg
--
"What have you got in that paper bag?
Is it a dose of Vitamin C?
Ain't got no time for Western medicine
I am Damo Suzuki" - Mark E Smith

 

[MyPostingID]

Phil: "He's going to come in under 8 minutes!"
Paul: "Well, he's going to come in under 9 minutes..."

 

[[email protected]]

On Jul 27, 11:03 am, Jay Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????

 

[samson]

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> On Jul 27, 11:03 am, Jay Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> > After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> > "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????

The sad and unfortunate answer is yes.

S.

 

[Mark]

Stu Fleming wrote:
> Jay Hill wrote:
>>
>> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.

Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
something about how that sounded odd.

Mark J.

 

[samson]

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Stu Fleming wrote:
> > Jay Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> >> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
> something about how that sounded odd.
>
> Mark J.
>

Karpets is flying?

S.

 

[Simon Brooke]

in message <[email protected]>, samson
('[email protected]') wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
>> Stu Fleming wrote:
>> > Jay Hill wrote:
>> >>
>> >> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> >> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>>
>> Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
>> something about how that sounded odd.
>
> Karpets is flying?

Flying Karpets.

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

'You cannot put "The Internet" into the Recycle Bin.'