Jim Dumas wrote:
> Jim Dumas wrote:
>>> So now I'm looking at lipids with the Bioscanner 2000
>>> meter and noticed they are high.
> Decided to feed the willbill parking meter:
))))
i'm not ignoring your posts. yesterday i asked a local
pharmacy about bioscanner and cardiochek and only got refs
to bigger/specialized medical companies. today i checked
with a local Wal-Mart and got zero
a google check on the web later today
(
http://www.healthchecksystems.com/bioscanner.htm) shows
that this bioscanner and strips are not cheap ($140 for the
meter and 3.5 bucks/strip for each of the total-
cholesterol/HDL/triglyceride)
have you used the cardiocheck meter?
>
> Another example from the last 24h. Yeasterday from 3:35 to
> 4:37 pm,
> 15.7 miles in 62 minutes with 6 stop lights on the route.
> Course is flat with winds. Before and after ketones of
> 4.1 mg/dl. BG was 88 mg/dl before and 92 mg/dl after
> with about 100 calories of sucrose at the start. Before
> and after triglycerides were 258 and 218 mg/dl. Only
> basal ultralente working
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
false
i've yet to see anything substantive on the residual of any
of the NPH insulins
and trust me, i've been actively looking for the last 5+
years
afaik, beef-NPH has residual that goes well beyond 24 hours.
fwiw, i wouldn't be surprised if "human"-NPH has some
(lesser) residual beyond 24 hours
> with 19U morning dose (added 3U more for 409 mg/dl
> triglyceride assay).
geez louise jim.
you want to keep your day-to-day background insulin
constant!
using an insulin pump is the primary thing that you could do
that will drive this home
if you really do have day-to-day variability of your basal
needs, using an insulin pump is the one thing that you can
do to identify it
> Wife decided to make pizza (large like Red Barron cheese
> only) with solid sheet of pepperoni on top of the cheese
> layer. (I don't have the heart to push her into DM diets.)
> Ate 1/2 the pizza and salad at 5:15 pm with 26U R dose and
> no delay. Salad had make-it-yourself dressing with Wesson
> vegetable oil: I want olive oil but she doesn't like the
> flavor. No hypoglycemia occurred postprandially.
jeez, Wesson vegetable oil will kill you in the long
run. problem is that it takes time and still isn't
understood (imo)
in addition to avoiding "vegetable oil", the main fat to be
avoiding is trans fat
>
> 12am bedtime data was BG: 154 mg/dl, total Chol: 246
> mg/dl, HDL: 36 mg/dl and TGs: HIGH! (>500 mg/dl).
246/36 = 6.8
even worse than your last 2 ratios.
> I decided to add 7U NPH to my usual bedtime 18U NPH dose
> so basal dose was 25U NPH.
you do NOT want to be making BIG variance to your daily
background insulin amounts!!!!!
> I added 9U R to control the 154 BG. The 7U NPH suggests a
> 60 mg/dl/NPH unit is really better for triglyceride
> disposal. I was using 75 mg/dl/NPH unit. I have a very
> strong dawn phenomenon that wipes out exercise effects. So
> again, bedtime dose was 9R+25N with the tail of the
> morning 19U ultralente working too.
>
> No nocturnal hypoglycemia.
>
> 8am morning data was BG: 120 mg/dl, total Chol: 231 mg/dl,
> HDL: 33 mg/dl, TGs: 211 mg/dl, calculated LDL: 156 mg/dl.
247/33 = 7.0, the worst of all your ratios.
>
> Not too bad
see immediately above
> but added a 1U ultralente bumper to the morning basal for
> the 211 mg/dl TGs since my TG target is 100 mg/dl.
>
> The assumption in the bedtime dosing is the NPH impacts BG
> and TGs. But the bedtime R only has a major impact on BG.
> So I calculate bedtime NPH using only TGs then use a
> variable R dose with the area under the NPH dose action
> profile subtracted out of this R dose. The math model is
> now using relative potency factors, (to properly scale
> different insulins before addition to form a composite
> action profile), for BG and another set for TGs! Yeah!
> More complexity.
>
> A few weeks ago I decided to try a pseudo-sham experiment
> to see if the extra bedtime NPH was really doing
> anything. My bedtime TGs were 170 mg/dl and I took 4U
> extra NPH for a 22U dose (3U too much). I suffered
> nocturnal hypoglycemia and became an instant believer
> that the 3U was really doing something. I did not start
> my exercise program yet. So no exercise effects to worry
> about in this data.
>
> In any case, TGs appear to be respond well to variable
> basal insulin.
i don't believe that coz you are the only one saying that
(that i've seen)
i'll grant that it has my attention.
))))
when i get some money, i'll give some serious though to
getting a bioscanner 2000 and the strips that it uses
is there any reason i should get a cardiochek?
bill t1 since '57