In article <
[email protected]>, "Paul Westall"
<
[email protected]> wrote:
> Can someone enlighten me about pedal cleats? Am I correct that Look and SPD are the main cleats?
> Which do people prefer, pros and cons. Also, do most Campy pedals use Look cleats, or does Campy
> have their own/ TIA Paul
It is fairest to say that Look and SPD are the two most popular systems, and further, that they
represent the two basic forms most other systems take.
Look is a wide, road-oriented, non-walkable cleat. Basically, it has a big plastic triangle for a
cleat that essentially becomes the sole of your shoe. This is exactly as easy to walk in as it
sounds, and you can identify serious roadies by their awkward but hilarious off-bike gait.
The upside is excellent power-transfer, very positive engagement, and a generally comfortable
pedalling platform.
SPD is a small, recessed cleat. In short, you usually get a basically normal shoe with an SPD cleat,
and you can walk around in them without trouble, more or less. The engagement is not as positive as
with a Look cleat, and some report that the narrower cleat causes "hot spots" on their feet. The
walkability is partly a convenience feature, and partly for MTBers who actually have to put their
feet down sometimes.
There are loads of variations. Both Shimano (SPD-SL) and Campy (?) have "Look-like" un-walkable
pedal systems for roadies. Lots of makers (Speedplay, Time) have cleat/pedal setups that are similar
to one or the other of these designs, or sometimes rather different, but generally are either
walkable or not. There are also clones (VP, Wellgo) that are completely compatible with SPD cleats
and pedals.
Of the SPD-style designs, XC riders have adopted the fairly new Eggbeater pedals as pretty much the
perfect design. Super-simple, four points of entry, and very mud-friendly, which is something you
can't say about ordinary SPD.
--
Ryan Cousineau,
[email protected] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club