Road Cycling · Public discussion

Lucky kid!

Started by Gooserider · · Last activity · 54 posts · 1,565 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 February 2008
Last activity
7 February 2008
Original author
Gooserider
Posts
54
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,565
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 54
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    For pity's sake, I get enough pointless arguing from my marriage, I'm
    not looking for it here!

    The trick is to not read the threads that don't interest you. It's
    not hard to master!

    - Frank Krygowski

  2. On Feb 2, 12:41 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the actual harm (in

    reduced cycling) that helmet> laws universally do.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    We do?

    There's certainly plenty of evidence of such reductions. Whether the
    reductions are universal is hard to say, because there are some places
    where counts haven't been done. (Helmet law promoters in the US seem
    to be taking special pains to prevent before-after surveys.)

    But AFAIK, a significant reduction in cycling has occurred in every
    place where a helmet law is enforced, and realistic counts have been
    performed.

    See http://www.cyclehelmets.org/mf.html?1096 for some summaries.

    - Frank Krygowski

  3. Bill Sornson said:

    Sigh. One more time: COMMON SENSE AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCE HAVE NO PLACE IN
    HELMET WARS, BECAUSE TO AHZs IT'S A RELIGIOUS ISSUE AND THEY'RE TRUE (NON)
    BELIEVERS!

    Talk about backwards thinking!

    For years, the helmet skeptics have been the ones producing the reams
    of data in these discussions. The true-believer helmet fans have been
    the ones typing all in caps, and making quips that sound like they're
    written by Paris Hilton.

    Understand, I used to be a helmet fan. It was the data that changed
    my mind. The same learning has happened for many others who were once
    helmet fans. But of course, this happens only if one questions the
    "true faith" in helmets, and actually does some research. Oh, and
    actually understands numbers.

    Prove me wrong, Bill. Show us the data proving significant decreases
    in serious head injuries per rider that's resulted from a significant
    increase in helmet use.

    You might want to start with http://www.cyclehelmets.org/mf.html?1038

    - Frank Krygowski

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bill Sornson said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was wearing a helmet when I was hit by a truck mirror---in the back
    of the head. My helmet cracked, yet my skull was uninjured. If
    nothing else, the helmet prevented me from having my head laid open
    by the impact.

    Sigh. One more time: COMMON SENSE AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCE HAVE NO PLACE IN
    HELMET WARS,

    War? There's another war? Whomever's doing it -- please stop.
    As the song says: love the one you're with.

    Quoted message said:

    BECAUSE TO AHZs IT'S A RELIGIOUS ISSUE AND THEY'RE TRUE (NON)
    BELIEVERS! (Exactly like /another/ leading issue of the day, initials
    "G.W."😉

    I don't mind GWGs but I prefer Levis. (boot cut.)
    I've got a GAP denim jacket that everybody covets.
    The inner pockets are oh so kewl.

    Where were we? Oh, yeah -- helmets. I'm of two
    minds about 'em. Maybe I should buy a second one.
    Then I could be at odds with myself.

    Life should be interesting anyways.

    Hi-vis/reflective vests are a good thing too.
    Everybody should wear 'em at all times.
    But so many idjits are so religiously against 'em,
    and it's their own durned fault if they get clobbered.
    But we don't need to start yet another war about it.
    Those who get pasted while not wearing a hi-vis vest
    are simply unworthy of attaining paradise. They instead
    end up in East St Louis or Cleveland or Akron or Enid.
    It is so written. We must leave the lost to their
    respective fates.

    Heck, we've gotta shut-down some old wars, in order
    to clear-out some room for new ones -- if ya really
    want new ones.

    How's the war on poverty and the war on drugs going?
    (Or is that the same, tired ol' war?)

    You conservatives sure like to think in terms of
    War and Religion. Kinda like some folks in parts
    of the Middle East.

    Jihad on the styrofoam bicycle helmet skeptics,
    heretics & doubters! Heh :-)

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    Nothing is safe from me.
    I'm really at:
    tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca

  5. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Leo Lichtman wrote:
    : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the actual
    harm (in
    : > reduced cycling) that helmet
    : >> laws universally do.
    : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > We do?
    : >
    : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of cycling
    : activities drops.

    that certainly is not the case in Australia

    --

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : On Feb 2, 12:41 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>
    : wrote:
    : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the actual
    harm (in
    : >
    : > reduced cycling) that helmet> laws universally do.
    : >
    : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > We do?
    :
    : There's certainly plenty of evidence of such reductions. Whether the
    : reductions are universal is hard to say, because there are some places
    : where counts haven't been done. (Helmet law promoters in the US seem
    : to be taking special pains to prevent before-after surveys.)
    :
    : But AFAIK, a significant reduction in cycling has occurred in every
    : place where a helmet law is enforced, and realistic counts have been
    : performed.
    :
    : See http://www.cyclehelmets.org/mf.html?1096 for some summaries.
    :
    : - Frank Krygowski

    more statistical hoo ha - significant reduction - realistic counts

    of course there are going to be reductions in cycling usage immediately
    after helmet laws are introduced - if for no other reason that cyclists have
    not been equipped with helmets up to that point in time - a secondary
    reason for initial rejection of compulsory helmet laws is the natural human
    tendency to reject and resent change

    --

    ---

    a friendly growl from the bear on the Zephyr that roars

    __ __ __ _ __
    /__/ / /__/ /_ /_\ /_ /
    /_ / _ / /__/ /__ / \ / \ ....Kawasaki Zephyr

    barry j taylor < [email hidden] >
    Ulysses #25871: netrider #549
    Skype: ursusaustralis

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  7. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    : No reasonable person has denied that the Bicycle Foam Hat can work as a
    : scratch and bump protector. To believe the Bicycle Foam Hat provides
    : significant protection against skull fracture and/or serious brain
    : injury indicates an ignorance of how little energy said hat can absorb.
    :
    : --
    : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    : - A. Derleth

    and once upon a time science had the statistics to prove that the world is
    flat

    --

    ---

    a friendly growl from the bear on the Zephyr that roars

    __ __ __ _ __
    /__/ / /__/ /_ /_\ /_ /
    /_ / _ / /__/ /__ / \ / \ ....Kawasaki Zephyr

    barry j taylor < [email hidden] >
    Ulysses #25871: netrider #549
    Skype: ursusaustralis

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  8. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    :: >
    : Pro-foam bicycle hat zealots do not believe in science.
    :
    and anti-foam hat zealots do not believe in experiences of the real world

    --

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  9. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Leo Lichtman wrote:
    : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the actual
    harm (in
    : > reduced cycling) that helmet
    : >> laws universally do.
    : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > We do?
    : >
    : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of cycling
    : activities drops.

    that certainly is not the case in Australia


    Some reading material that disagrees: <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  10. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    : No reasonable person has denied that the Bicycle Foam Hat can work as a
    : scratch and bump protector. To believe the Bicycle Foam Hat provides
    : significant protection against skull fracture and/or serious brain
    : injury indicates an ignorance of how little energy said hat can absorb.
    :
    : --
    : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    : - A. Derleth

    and once upon a time science had the statistics to prove that the world is
    flat


    Huh? No such event ever occurred. The belief in a flat world was not
    obtained by scientific methods, but by religious superstition.

    Most of the Liddite position is also based on a blind faith in the
    Bicycle Foam Hat that is not backed by proper scientific research.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  11. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    :: >
    : Pro-foam bicycle hat zealots do not believe in science.
    :
    and anti-foam hat zealots do not believe in experiences of the real world


    Nonsense. It is the real world experience of the cycling population that
    shows that bicycle foam hats have not provided a net safety benefit.

    The Liddites prefer to ignore the science of the real world for their
    intuition.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  12. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Leo Lichtman wrote:
    : > : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the
    actual
    : > harm (in
    : > : > reduced cycling) that helmet
    : > : >> laws universally do.
    : > : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > : > We do?
    : > : >
    : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of
    cycling
    : > : activities drops.
    : >
    : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : >
    : Some reading material that disagrees: <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.

    in the immediate short term maybe

    in the long term definitely NO

    --

    ---

    a friendly growl from the bear on the Zephyr that roars

    __ __ __ _ __
    /__/ / /__/ /_ /_\ /_ /
    /_ / _ / /__/ /__ / \ / \ ....Kawasaki Zephyr

    barry j taylor < [email hidden] >
    Ulysses #25871: netrider #549
    Skype: ursusaustralis

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  13. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of
    cycling
    : > : activities drops.
    : >
    : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : >
    : Some reading material that disagrees: <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.

    that would have to be the worst argued article I have ever read
    and the most blatant misuse of statistics I have come across

    if that is what you call science in action I will remain a 'Liddite'
    but I'd prefer to be known as a non Luddite

    ---

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  14. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : >
    : > : No reasonable person has denied that the Bicycle Foam Hat can work
    as a
    : > : scratch and bump protector. To believe the Bicycle Foam Hat
    provides
    : > : significant protection against skull fracture and/or serious brain
    : > : injury indicates an ignorance of how little energy said hat can
    absorb.
    : > :
    : > : --
    : > : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : > : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    : > : - A. Derleth
    : >
    : > and once upon a time science had the statistics to prove that the
    world is
    : > flat
    : >
    : Huh? No such event ever occurred. The belief in a flat world was not
    : obtained by scientific methods, but by religious superstition.

    that's what the next generation of scientists always argue

    : Most of the Liddite position is also based on a blind faith in the
    : Bicycle Foam Hat that is not backed by proper scientific research.

    if you weren't so serious that would be humorous if not ludicrous

    are you prepared to be the subject of a study to back up your claims ?
    I am sure that I could find a legitimate science department at one of the
    local unviersities or technical institutes that would be prepared to use you
    and your head as a control for a study of the effectiveness of bicycle
    helmets in reducing head injuries and brain damage

    BTWEMWTK what is a Liddite ?

    --

    ---

    a friendly growl from the bear on the Zephyr that roars

    __ __ __ _ __
    /__/ / /__/ /_ /_\ /_ /
    /_ / _ / /__/ /__ / \ / \ ....Kawasaki Zephyr

    barry j taylor < [email hidden] >
    Ulysses #25871: netrider #549
    Skype: ursusaustralis

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  15. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Leo Lichtman wrote:
    : > : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about the
    actual
    : > harm (in
    : > : > reduced cycling) that helmet
    : > : >> laws universally do.
    : > : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > : > We do?
    : > : >
    : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of
    cycling
    : > : activities drops.
    : >
    : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : >
    : Some reading material that disagrees: <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.

    in the immediate short term maybe

    in the long term definitely NO


    Citation for this contention?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  16. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the level of
    cycling
    : > : activities drops.
    : >
    : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : >
    : Some reading material that disagrees: <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.

    that would have to be the worst argued article I have ever read
    and the most blatant misuse of statistics I have come across

    if that is what you call science in action I will remain a 'Liddite'
    but I'd prefer to be known as a non Luddite


    This from a person who believes in anecdotal evidence with no control
    case as proof???

    Look at the linked articles.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  17. Barry Taylor said:

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : >
    : > : No reasonable person has denied that the Bicycle Foam Hat can work
    as a
    : > : scratch and bump protector. To believe the Bicycle Foam Hat
    provides
    : > : significant protection against skull fracture and/or serious brain
    : > : injury indicates an ignorance of how little energy said hat can
    absorb.
    : > :
    : > : --
    : > : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : > : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    : > : - A. Derleth
    : >
    : > and once upon a time science had the statistics to prove that the
    world is
    : > flat
    : >
    : Huh? No such event ever occurred. The belief in a flat world was not
    : obtained by scientific methods, but by religious superstition.

    that's what the next generation of scientists always argue

    : Most of the Liddite position is also based on a blind faith in the
    : Bicycle Foam Hat that is not backed by proper scientific research.

    if you weren't so serious that would be humorous if not ludicrous


    No, what is ludicrous is the blind faith in a lightweight web of
    expanded polystyrene actually preventing serious head injury or death.

    Quoted message said:

    are you prepared to be the subject of a study to back up your claims ?
    I am sure that I could find a legitimate science department at one of the
    local unviersities or technical institutes that would be prepared to use you
    and your head as a control for a study of the effectiveness of bicycle
    helmets in reducing head injuries and brain damage


    No, since the outcome is obvious in either case - with or without the
    foam bicycle hat.

    Quoted message said:

    BTWEMWTK what is a Liddite ?


    A Liddite is a person with faith in the effectiveness of foam bicycle
    hats to prevent serious head injury or death.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  18. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    : > : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : > : Leo Lichtman wrote:
    : > : > : > "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: (clip) Moreover, we know about
    the
    : > actual
    : > : > harm (in
    : > : > : > reduced cycling) that helmet
    : > : > : >> laws universally do.
    : > : > : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    : > : > : > We do?
    : > : > : >
    : > : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the
    level of
    : > cycling
    : > : > : activities drops.
    : > : >
    : > : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : > : >
    : > : Some reading material that disagrees:
    <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.
    : >
    : > in the immediate short term maybe
    : >
    : > in the long term definitely NO
    : >
    : Citation for this contention?

    thanks for asking - from cycle-helmets.com
    "The opening of a northern railway and widening of the freeway during
    intervening years would influence these figures. However, they suggest
    cyclist numbers fell dramatically after the bicycle helmet law was
    introduced with the increase in numbers since 1998 compensating for that
    fall."
    :

    --

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  19. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : > : Yes, whenever mandatory helmet laws are introduced, the
    level of
    : > cycling
    : > : > : activities drops.
    : > : >
    : > : > that certainly is not the case in Australia
    : > : >
    : > : Some reading material that disagrees:
    <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/>.
    : >
    : > that would have to be the worst argued article I have ever read
    : > and the most blatant misuse of statistics I have come across
    : >
    : > if that is what you call science in action I will remain a 'Liddite'
    : > but I'd prefer to be known as a non Luddite
    : >
    : This from a person who believes in anecdotal evidence with no control
    : case as proof???

    I'm waiting for you to volunteer to act as a subject in a control case

    : Look at the linked articles.

    I did - and seeing as they don't take into consideration things like
    population growth, changes in public transport etc I'll remein a sceptic
    about pseudo science and manipulated statistics

    :
    : --
    : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    : - A. Derleth

    --

    ---

    a friendly growl from the bear on the Zephyr that roars

    __ __ __ _ __
    /__/ / /__/ /_ /_\ /_ /
    /_ / _ / /__/ /__ / \ / \ ....Kawasaki Zephyr

    barry j taylor < [email hidden] >
    Ulysses #25871: netrider #549
    Skype: ursusaustralis

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*) . . . bjbear on his treadly

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  20. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : Barry Taylor wrote:
    : > : > "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    : > : > news:[email hidden]...
    : > : >
    : > : > : No reasonable person has denied that the Bicycle Foam Hat
    can work
    : > as a
    : > : > : scratch and bump protector. To believe the Bicycle Foam Hat
    : > provides
    : > : > : significant protection against skull fracture and/or serious
    brain
    : > : > : injury indicates an ignorance of how little energy said hat
    can
    : > absorb.
    : > : > :
    : > : > : --
    : > : > : Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    : > : > : "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all
    people."
    : > : > : - A. Derleth
    : > : >
    : > : > and once upon a time science had the statistics to prove that
    the
    : > world is
    : > : > flat
    : > : >
    : > : Huh? No such event ever occurred. The belief in a flat world was
    not
    : > : obtained by scientific methods, but by religious superstition.
    : >
    : > that's what the next generation of scientists always argue
    : >
    : > : Most of the Liddite position is also based on a blind faith in the
    : > : Bicycle Foam Hat that is not backed by proper scientific research.

    nor is there any proper scientific research to prove that bicycle helmets
    do not prevent serious head injury or death

    what there is, is a large body of evidence that bicycle helmets have
    prevented some serious head injuries and/or death

    : >
    : > if you weren't so serious that would be humorous if not ludicrous
    : >
    : No, what is ludicrous is the blind faith in a lightweight web of
    : expanded polystyrene actually preventing serious head injury or death.

    oh ye of little faith
    pray that you never get to be the empirical evidence that it your unfaith
    is misplaced

    :
    : > are you prepared to be the subject of a study to back up your claims
    ?
    : > I am sure that I could find a legitimate science department at one
    of the
    : > local unviersities or technical institutes that would be prepared to
    use you
    : > and your head as a control for a study of the effectiveness of bicycle
    : > helmets in reducing head injuries and brain damage
    : >
    : No, since the outcome is obvious in either case - with or without the
    : foam bicycle hat.

    obvious to you maybe - but then you have a closed mind
    whereas I only had my eyes closed when I hit the dirt

    :
    : > BTWEMWTK what is a Liddite ?
    : >
    : A Liddite is a person with faith in the effectiveness of foam bicycle
    : hats to prevent serious head injury or death.

    guilty as charged
    and that's why I have bought a new helmet to replace the one damaged in my
    crash

    ---
    bjt

    a man of words and
    not of deeds
    is like a garden full of weeds.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.