N
Nick Kew
Guest
Simon Brooke wrote:
>>Not unless I can, at the very least, walk comfortably in it.
>
>
> You can generally walk comfortably in any shoes designed for mountain
> biking or cyclo-cross - necessarily so, because in these disciplines
> occasions when one has to get off and carry are not that infrequent.
>
That followeth not. I wouldn't describe my mountaineering boots as
a comfortable walk (the ones that take a crampon, not the lightweight
walking boots for UK conditions - which are indeed comfy).
Neither would I describe _any_ climbing shoes as even remotely comfy.
If it's marketed for a particular activity, there's always a risk
that performance _in that activity_ comes at the expense of comfort.
Someone else praised stiff but shaped souls. I've encountered
those in mountain boots, and found them deadly.
--
not me guv
>>Not unless I can, at the very least, walk comfortably in it.
>
>
> You can generally walk comfortably in any shoes designed for mountain
> biking or cyclo-cross - necessarily so, because in these disciplines
> occasions when one has to get off and carry are not that infrequent.
>
That followeth not. I wouldn't describe my mountaineering boots as
a comfortable walk (the ones that take a crampon, not the lightweight
walking boots for UK conditions - which are indeed comfy).
Neither would I describe _any_ climbing shoes as even remotely comfy.
If it's marketed for a particular activity, there's always a risk
that performance _in that activity_ comes at the expense of comfort.
Someone else praised stiff but shaped souls. I've encountered
those in mountain boots, and found them deadly.
--
not me guv