R
roger
Guest
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:01:38 GMT, Andi B.
<anbo23@_nospam_.my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:10:16 GMT, roger<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:47:51 -0400, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> >>> Christ lives.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Prove it.
>>>> >
>>>> > Why should I?
>>>>
>>>> Because you claimed it to be so. Put up or shut up.
>>>
>>>It is not my claim but the Word of God.
>>
>>Please provide proof that it is the Word of God and not the word or
>>someone who claims that it is the Word of God.
>
>Excellent point.
>
>He'll probably come back and say that it is "established scientific
>knowledge" or something.
I doubt it. If Chung is really an MD/PhD he realizes that there is
absolutely no scientific evidence of the existence of God. He is just
talking out of his ass. Perhaps he is really a proctologist)
Roger
<anbo23@_nospam_.my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:10:16 GMT, roger<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:47:51 -0400, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> >>> Christ lives.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Prove it.
>>>> >
>>>> > Why should I?
>>>>
>>>> Because you claimed it to be so. Put up or shut up.
>>>
>>>It is not my claim but the Word of God.
>>
>>Please provide proof that it is the Word of God and not the word or
>>someone who claims that it is the Word of God.
>
>Excellent point.
>
>He'll probably come back and say that it is "established scientific
>knowledge" or something.
I doubt it. If Chung is really an MD/PhD he realizes that there is
absolutely no scientific evidence of the existence of God. He is just
talking out of his ass. Perhaps he is really a proctologist)
Roger