J
Jdaigle
Guest
Last year, I did a test to determine my maximum heart rate that was suggested in one of the books I
read. I am 29 years old, so using the 220-age formula, the result should have been approximatly 191
bpm. When I did the test, I got my heart rate up to around 198 bpm. Which if I multiply by 0.85 (the
recommended upper training limit percentage), I get about 168bpm max during training. I found that
during training I usually was way over this number, typically riding in the mid 180s or low 190s
bpm. I was beginning to wonder if I had performed the test correctly, so I redid the test last night
on my rollers, I was able to get my heart rate up to 210, when I decided to stop pushing it. So my
question is, should I worry that the max hr is about 20bpm higher than the "normal" formula
prediction? Thanks! Jeff
read. I am 29 years old, so using the 220-age formula, the result should have been approximatly 191
bpm. When I did the test, I got my heart rate up to around 198 bpm. Which if I multiply by 0.85 (the
recommended upper training limit percentage), I get about 168bpm max during training. I found that
during training I usually was way over this number, typically riding in the mid 180s or low 190s
bpm. I was beginning to wonder if I had performed the test correctly, so I redid the test last night
on my rollers, I was able to get my heart rate up to 210, when I decided to stop pushing it. So my
question is, should I worry that the max hr is about 20bpm higher than the "normal" formula
prediction? Thanks! Jeff