I am 28 yo, thus according to the 220-age formula my maximum heart rate should be of about 192. I'm using a HRM since one year and I have never seen my HR go over 180bpm, even when I was going to the maximum effort I could perceive. So I think 180bpm is my MHR.
My question is: how MHR in men compares to displacement in engines? In other words, a 28 years old athlete with a MHR of 180bpm is intrinsicly a better or a worse athlete then a 28yo with a MHR of 192, or of 200?
My question is: how MHR in men compares to displacement in engines? In other words, a 28 years old athlete with a MHR of 180bpm is intrinsicly a better or a worse athlete then a 28yo with a MHR of 192, or of 200?