Corvus Corvax wrote:
> LIBERATOR wrote:
> > I offered to teach Ride-A-Lot how to become an advanced skilled MTBer
> > in one day, I guarantee that after 8 hours of my instruction Ride-A-Lot
> > without any fear will be able to ride any black diamond rated trail in
> > Colorado, all he has to do is buy me a nice video camera after I get
> > him to these skills...
> >
> > He refused and responded with mockery, which he can't back or
> > substantiate, so you then became one of his little allies...
> >
> > Why don't you get him to take me up on the deal, if he doesn't end up
> > with the skills I guarantee he will, all he is out is 8 hours time...
> >
> > But he won't, cuz he's scared, or simply Virginia Newbon can't use him
> > anymore because he won't be a weak tard with no skills..
>
> I am not writing to agree or disagree with Liberator. What I have to
> say, however, regards Liberator's conscious decision to cripple his
> enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and
> psychologically. Let me cut to the chase: We wouldn't have a problem
> with collectivism if it weren't for him.
STFU you goof.
> Although Liberator created the
> problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, he insists
> that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power.
I created no problem, Ride-Her-Much started insulting me when I gave
him constructive criticism with no insulting content.
> How naïve does Liberator think we are? Truly, we have a dilemma of
> leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we hold out the prospect of
> societal peace, prosperity, and a return to sane values and
> certainties, or is it sufficient to clarify and correct some of the
> inaccuracies present in his "compromises"?
You're saucing up when there's no main entree needing sauce baby.
> To turn that question
> around, do his effusions appear reasonable to anyone other than
> avaricious curmudgeons?
My sock puppets are better versed in prose than you are you Newbon
kook.
> To answer that question, we need first to
> consider Liberator's thought process, which generally takes the
> following form: (1) Liberator is a model citizen, so (2) he has the
> linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature.
Something tells me you spent hours on this piece.
> Therefore, (3) blasphemous devotees of conspiracy theories and witless
> sluggards should rule this country and thus, (4) he could do a gentler
> and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. As you can see,
> Liberator's reasoning makes no sense, which leads me to believe that
> ignorance is bliss.
One who can see all that is won't make sense to one who can see nothing
due to ignorance being his blindness. Or her blindness, I don't know if
you're a he or she, but I'm willing to bet you're a member in the gay
penguin squadron.
> This may be why his toadies are generally all
> smiles. When Liberator tells us that superstition is no less credible
> than proven scientific principles, he somehow fails to mention that his
> detractors are correct in their observation that the time has come to
> maintain social tranquillity.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!! now I gotta go whee whee.....
> He fails to mention that his
> disquisitions bespeak a spiritual crassness, a materialistic and
> short-sighted stupidity that will bombard us with an endless array of
> hate literature by the end of the decade.
You have the acuity and dexterity of a retarded porpoise.
> And he fails to mention that
> it is immature and stupid of him to promote racial superiority
> doctrines, ethnic persecution, imperialist expansion, and genocide.
I've never promoted any of the such thus again you're definitely
resonating the mentality of a retarded porpoise.
> It
> would be mature and intelligent, however, to rub his nose in his own
> hypocrisy, and that's why I say that his editorials are designed to
> delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a
> counter-hegemony that seeks to create some unholy, pseudo-psychological
> profile of me to discredit my opinions.
One can definitely tell this is not your normal level of prose. You're
trying to portray yourself as a advanced linguistic scholar, it's so
sloppy and rhythmless that's what blew it for you you pelican idolizer.
> And they're working; they're
> having the desired effect. Even Liberator's trucklers couldn't deal
> with the full impact of Liberator's op-ed pieces. That's why they
> created "Liberator-ism," which is just an amateurish excuse to prevent
> people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly
> psychologically caged existence.
I hope you're not trying out for a position in RUSH, Neil although
degenerative lately, has you beat by miles still.
> I won't lie to you; we need to look beyond the most immediate and
> visible problems with Liberator.
Oh this is gonna be good mythical self-projection from the self-adoring
self-idolatry porpoise...
> We need to look at what is behind
> these problems and understand that it's possible that I do not intend
> this letter to be in any way misinterpreted as a personal attack on
> Liberator.
You're a kookdum fifedom goofdum goobie doo Moosey doo flubber boop..
> However, I cannot speculate about that possibility here
> because I need to devote more space to a description of how the last
> time I told Liberator's provocateurs that I want to straighten out
> Liberator's thinking, they declared in response, "But peremptory,
> annoying paper-pushers are more deserving of honor than our nation's
> war heroes."
You pathetic annoyance, go play scrabble with Ride-A-Lot and share your
jar of pickles and banannas with him or the Mooseys will come & stomp
you out and gobble you down for dinner..
> Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's
> exactly what they meant. Liberator is a bit teched. That shouldn't
> surprise you when you consider that it doesn't do us much good to
> become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of his smears
> in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join
> forces with us, then we must deal with him appropriately.
I will suggest to Ride-A-Lot he makes you a Field Marshal in the Gay
Penguin Squadron, you can commander the turtle panzers against the
Mooses.
> I, for one,
> find his cacoëthes loquendi most irritating, and besides, he is guilty
> of a shocking display of dishonesty and sophistry.
Man dude, I maybe the reincarnated ****** & Thomas Jefferson, but I had
to look that **** up man.... and It wasn't even in the dictionary...
you banana eating Moosey loving pickle addict...
> I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete
> enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those
> shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I
> explain that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that he's like
> the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz.
Hey man, I'm all over singletracks.com, I'm hiding from no one,
obviously you're in Kookdom land, in a world of make believe where
maybe there is a wizard behind the curtain directing the orchestra with
such a wonderful accentuation... and you dance right along with the
make believe world you believe to be real... such a great sheep in the
herd you are the Mooseys are waiting around the corner to scarf you
down for a snack you plywood plumber...
> Pull back the curtain
> of careerism and you'll see a power-hungry, savage psychopath hiding
> behind it, furiously pulling the levers of gnosticism in a meddlesome
> attempt to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should
> function.
You should have used "ferocious" not furious you buck tooth sawed off
one eared giraffe.
> That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize
> that thanks to Liberator, the epidemic of Fabianism is spreading
> rapidly. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and
> the consequences are undeniable. So why does Liberator think that those
> who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be
> shunned, should starve?
You're hallucinating you sawed off runt. I encourage disagreement.
Check with the Panzer turtles next time before you attempt blitzkrieg
on the Mooseys.
> It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but
> it should be noted that the poisonous wine of plagiarism had been
> distilled long before Liberator entered the scene.
Hey that wasn't so bad, Neil might like that. Gobble gobble gobble
peckerwood peckerwood peckerwood...
> Liberator is merely
> the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug
> that is world humanity. Let us not sink to Liberator's level. Let us
> combat irrationalism by exercising our right to speak out, to denounce
> Liberator's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically
> reasoned arguments) as totally unrepresentative of the values of this
> society.
You are a defeated citizen fully loyal to the Communist thought
controllers. They love little fish eating penguins like you, especially
when you have the sanctioned pink bootys Ride-A-lot has made mandatory
for the infantry.
> Liberator is not just heartless. He is unbelievably, astronomically
> heartless.
Not true at all, Ride-A-Lot initiated the war with me, thinking his
feminism was weaponry, he went into attack formation and I responded in
defense and obviously the best defense is a good offfense, of which the
plumpy penguin commander is now in retreat.
> The problem, as I see it, is not a question of who the
> bigamists of this society are, but rather that by brainwashing his
> legatees with communism, Liberator makes them easy to lead, easy to
> program, and easy to enslave. The unalterable law of biology has a
> corollary that is generally overlooked.
Hey that wasn't too bad either... Nice one plumber...
> Specifically, he wants to
> promote disrespectful ideologies such as solipsism. Who does he think
> he is? I mean, he should pay for his mistakes.
What mistakes, please due tell... Tell us what's in that self-conjuring
mind of yours... and make sure you offer me pickles before I sit & hear
the story...
> But there's the rub;
> knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why
> it's important for you to know that I enjoy the great diversity of
> humankind, in our food, our dress, our music, our literature, and our
> forms of spiritual expression. What I don't enjoy are Liberator's mad
> opuscula which substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and
> honest debate.
Concerto would have been a better word than the one you used which
again I had to look up but couldn't because it was not in the
dictionary.
> Don't get me wrong; I seethe with anger whenever I think
> about Liberator's foolhardy manifestos. But Liberator wants me to stop
> trying to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and
> health to our cities. Instead, he'd rather I drop to my knees and beg
> for mercy. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. That's all I
> have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into
> Liberator's mentality, though, then study the details of his
> inclinations. Try to see the big picture: It will amaze you. It will
> take your breath away. And it will convince you that as far as
> Liberator's mudslinging traducements are concerned, I will not
> capitulate today, tomorrow, or ever.
I feel like giving you a hug my brother, lets promote love not war, and
listen to some Beatles songs, and eat some Bugos, cheese from
Wisconsin, and beer from Canada, well have such a joyful time even the
roaches in Ride-A-Lots house and tinker-bell will want to come.
> CC
