I certainly agree that POW's must be treated with dignity and compassion, for many reasons - only one of which is that we should hope our soldiers would be treated the same (even though it has virtually never happened). I also agree that displaying hooded prisoners on T.V. for flare is not cool. It becomes difficult however, for soldiers to manage all these things with embedded reporters, etc. Virtually everything the soldiers do is capable of being on CNN or Al-Jazeera that same night, so it's difficult to leave anything off cameras to be honest. I am not arguing that POWs should have hoods all the time, but there are MANY instances where a hood is needed for proper handling (transferring, etc). It prohibits them from being aware enough of their surroundings to do perilous things (grab weapons from people, team up with their friends, bite people, know exactly where they are, etc). Hoods are perfectly rational and not inhumane in these instances.Carrera said:The point is, though, that hooding prisoners of war goes against the Geneva Convention. Hooding Iraqi prisoners and depicting them on T.V. is a breach of human rights. Thus, American troops who might be so unfortunate as to be captured themselves run the risk of abuse as a result of their own conduct.
My own view is that if you treat POW's with dignity and compassion, the risks to your own soldiers are probably minimised. We have to remember Iraqi troops were ordered to defend their own country by their government so they weren't guilty of terrorism. They had no choice but to fight so they ought to have been treated with dignity when captured.
Also, we must use a little realism here. You are right, genuine Iraqi soldiers were fighting for their government and indeed not terrorists. However, the majority of resistance was from Fedayeen and other groups that used no uniforms, purposely blended in with the population, intentionally and VERY aggressively forced women and children from their own population to be shields (and sacrificed them on many cases intentionally), etc. In short, they were a determined enemy that played by NO rules and were willing to commit the most atrocious acts against even there own people at a moments notice. Of course we must strive to uphold the highest of standards, but don't tell the young soldier charged with sorting through the chaos of that sort of fight that it is inhumane to place a hood on a man to keep him from blowing you all up while you transfer him to a confinment facility or whatever.
I think we are agreeing on most points anyway. I just sometimes think we get a little carried away with how "perfect" we expect our soldiers to be when we put them in such unbelievable cirumstances where the enemy gives NO thought to any sort of rules. We certainly must allow them the tools to do their best. I contend there is absolutely nothing wrong with hooding POWs, and in many cases disallowing it would be akin to taking away our soldiers' body armor, and we all know how much people like to play up that whole angle.