General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

More on western diet risk research

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 328 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 November 2004
Last activity
18 November 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
328
Views / 30 days
1

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Here is the journal citation and abstract:

    http://tinyurl.com/5kaw3

  2. [email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Here is the journal citation and abstract:

    http://tinyurl.com/5kaw3

    LOL damn i just finished responding to your previous garbage and now
    this. Again total BS. A total lack of reality. It really is
    amazing. Completely ignoring the major factor as always (Western
    pattern was characterized by higher intakes of red and processed
    meats, sweets and desserts, french fries, and refined grains..) truly
    unbelievable. And of course their conclusion is a joke also.
    (CONCLUSION: A diet high in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes,
    poultry, and fish and low in refined grains, potatoes, and red and
    processed meats may lower risk of CHD) again not one mention of the
    major factor in modern "western" diets. If you can not bring yourself
    to see this joke for what it is and accept reality then you are just
    another pathetic fool and dupe. Even you should be able to step back
    and clear yourself of your biased stupidity and accept that just maybe
    they should at least be mentioning liquid/hydrogenated vegetable oils.
    It is so obvious that they are completely and purposely avoiding even
    talking about it. It is almost as if they are trying to pretend it
    does not even exist. And when it is such a MAJOR factor as I stated
    in my response to your previous post. You call that real science??
    It is a well known FACT that for researchers to say things that will
    upset the edible oil industry WILL JEAPORDIZE FUTURE FUNDING!! That
    is pure and simple reality. You may not understand or accept it but
    believe me those researchers know better than anyone else.

  3. Quoted message said:

    Here is the journal citation and abstract:

    http://tinyurl.com/5kaw3

    Where are your points? What is your point?

    Quoted message said:

    Fung et al. Arch Intern Med.2001; 161: 1857-1862.

    This is the year 2004. Just thought that you might want to know.

    This study does not address methods of cooking, so I fail to see what
    the choice of oil has to do with anything? That info is probably not
    even available from the data.

    Quoted message said:

    Using dietary information from a food frequency questionnaire in 1984

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Why not use data from 1950?

    Quoted message said:

    identified 2 major dietary patterns-"prudent" and "Western"

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    "prudent" and "Western"

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    Gee, you mean that you need a study to figure out that some people
    like to eat heathy while others don't?

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
    --
    john gohde
    http://gnu-dictionary.naturalhealthperspective.com/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.