"Bob Goodman" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Markiosi Probertios1" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<
[email protected]>...
> > "Organic Living" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
news:[email protected]... Re: your barmicidal post..
> >
> > The info you found below may sound ok to you.. But you might want to get your head around the
> > fact that many products now have to lists ingredients in personal care items from highest
> > content, to lowest content. Both these ingredients are found in a range of products. You will
> > usually find SLS in the top 3. (Both forms are still widely used..
> >
> > First, stop posting in HTML.
> >
> > Second, prove that both are used, that the amount used is of a doseage which can be toxic.
> >
> >
> > Like you say.. yes One is "clearly" MORE Toxic than the other.. Check next time your at the
> > supermakret and see..) Secondly.. the chemicals are the same in the fact that one is prepared
> > from the other..
>
> No, not even that. Lauryl sulfate is prepared by sulfonating/sulfating lauryl alcohol.
>
> Lauryl ether sulfate (laureth sulfate) is prepared by sulfating lauryl oligo(ethyl ether) alcohol.
>
> What is true is that lauryl oligo(ethyl ether) alcohol is prepared by ethoxylating lauryl alcohol.
>
> However, the biochemical activity of even sodium lauryl sulfate (known to biochemists as SDS,
> sodium dodecyl sulfate) could not be too great, because it is used in many biochemical
> experiments, and if it had profound effects in low conentrations, the results would be invalid.
>
> Typically SDS is used at high concentration as a denaturant in biochemical systems. If further
> work is to be done with the materials in a native state, the SDS is dialyzed away. However,
> scientists are not too concerned about trace amounts of SDS that may remain, as long as the
> concentrations are low enough not to affect the biologic system being studied.
>
> BTW, I have a patent on a bubble bath formula whose preferred versions use neither SLS (SDS) nor
> SLES. But it's not because of ridiculous claims of toxicity that I left them out!
>
> You may read more at
http://users.bestweb.net/~robgood/lather.html
>
> BTW, I didn't test on animals because it wouldn't've done me any good. However, I have in the past
> used animals in research where appropriate.
>
> But at least now you know how I can write authoritatively on this subject.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > thought that going on an organic diet (Free from toxic pesticides and other nasties) coupled
> > with detoxing your body and home would have better results than the leading fertility
> > treatments. And for litteral pennies in comparison.
> >
> > Another detoxer! I just love you detoxers.
> >
> > Hows the saying go..?
> >
> > All truth passes through 3 stages..First it is ridiculed.. Then it is
> > violently opposed, then it is accepted as if it was known all along..
> >
> > I am sorry to see you at stage 1.
> >
> > If I were you, I would be more worried about DiHydrogen Monoxide. It is a proven dangerous
> > substance, and is found worldwide. The fact that it is all natural is no protectant. In fact,
> > the discoverer of the danger of this chemical substance won a science fair!
> >
> > Dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people
> > every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of
> > dihydrogen monoxide do not end there. Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue
> > damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a
> > bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become
> > dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death. Dihydrogen monoxide:
> >
> >
> > a.. is also known as hydroxl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
> > b.. contributes to the "greenhouse effect."
> > c.. may cause severe burns.
> > d.. contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
> > e.. accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
> > f.. may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
> > g.. has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients. Contamination is reaching
> > epidemic proportions!
> >
> > Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in
> > America today. But the pollution is global, and the contaminant has even been found in Antarctic
> > ice. DHMO has caused millions of dollars of property damage in the midwest, and recently
> > California.
> >
> > Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
> >
> >
> > a.. as an industrial solvent and coolant.
> > b.. in nuclear power plants.
> > c.. in the production of styrofoam.
> > d.. as a fire retardant.
> > e.. in many forms of cruel animal research.
> > f.. in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by
> > this chemical.
> > g.. as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products. Companies dump waste DHMO
> > into rivers and the ocean, and nothing can be done to stop them because this practice is
> > still legal. The impact on wildlife is extreme, and we cannot afford to ignore it any
> > longer!
> >
> > The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging
> > chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation." In fact, the navy and
> > other military organizations are conducting experiments with DHMO, and designing multi-billion
> > dollar devices to control and utilize it during warfare situations. Hundreds of military
> > research facilities receive tons of it through a highly sophisticated underground distribution
> > network. Many store large quantities for later use.
Good post, Robert, but, being the internet scammin', spammin' lying dirtbag that s/h/it is, Organic
(so is manure) will not even bother to think about what yo wrote.
