In article <[email hidden]>,
Artoi said:In article <[email hidden]>,
John Forrest Tomlinson said:The original SPD road cleats (not SPD-SL or SPD-R) come with pontoons
for walking too.
What do they look like? How are they different to the SPD for MTB work?
--
http://www.jensonusa.com/store/product/PE406Z09-Sh-71+Floating+Spd+Cleat+
W+Pontoons.aspx
I'm not sure if that pontoon is a removable piece or not.
Also, that SPD cleat looks a little weird to me, but is definitely not
an SPD-R cleat, as you can see here:
http://www.jensonusa.com/store/product/PE406Z15-Shimano+Sm-Sh91+Spd-R+Cli
pless+Cleats.aspx
The tidiest setup I've seen for SPD-pattern cleats on a road shoe is
probably the Crank Brothers "quattro three hole cleat":
http://crankbrothers.com/3hole_cleat.php?itemId=
It is in fact Egg Beater compatible as well, so basically any 3-hole
road shoe can be made walkable.
That said, I think the best solution for most riders is to start with a
walkable shoe and work from there. Along with some very nice 2-hole
shoes designed for XC mountain biking (albeit usually with a sole
ranging from somewhat aggressive to very aggressive), there are also a
few shoemakers who have specialty road-style shoes with walkable
outsoles and take 2-hole cleats. Tourists like 'em, along with
semi-practical riders like myself.
For around town or non-competitive (but clipped) MTBing, Shimano and
others make a bunch of flexible-soled (stiffer than most normal shoes,
though) shoes that walk very nicely. Sheldon Brown is a big enough fan
of the SPD sandals that I should make this the year I try them out.
I'm currently experimenting with a set of Look pedals on my road racer,
but all I'm prepared to say about them is that they work as well as the
SPDs I previously used.
I have a bunch of SPD cleats on everything else, and my long-time
favourite shoes are my AXO Blackballs, a discontinued XC shoe with a
walkable outsole and a stiff plastic sole. They race great, walk well,
feel great, and the impending day when I wear them out will be a day of
sorrow.
Ironically, I'm seriously contemplating throwing all my SPD pedals to
the winds and converting my fleet to Egg Beaters. The reason is that I'm
quite enthusiastic about cyclocross, and the SPDs I have are just
horrible at mud and [censored] clearance. Basically, if stuff checks into the
pedal interface, it doesn't check out, and clipping in becomes a tedious
experience.
The Egg Beaters have a great reputation for [censored] clearance, which is
attractive. I have some concerns that missing a clip-in on those is more
likely to be problematic (two-sided SPDs have big enough pedals that a
miss usually ends with the pedal flat underneath the arch of my shoe.
You can pedal like that until you get clear of an intersection and have
enough momentum to attempt a second clip-in). I'm worried that the pedal
would tend to roll under my shoe if I tried to pedal while not clipped.
If anyone has done a good comparison of the original Egg Beaters with
the later Candy/Quattro/Smarty lines I'd love to hear it.
For that matter, if anyone can explain the reason why one would pay $120
for a Candy SL when the Smarty is lighter and half the price, I'd love
to hear it.
Hm. For that matter, the Smarty is nearly as light and the same price as
the value-leader Egg Beater mxr. Temptations abound...
--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos