I just wanted to make sure that there was no difference in chain rings of either the 130mm BCD and the 135mm BCD, except of course the bolt pattern/spacing? Basically, I'm assuming that the spacing between teeth on both Shimano and Campy chain rings is the same, thus the diameter of any given chainring with the same amount of teeth is the same (a Shimano 53-teeth chain ring has the same diameter as that of a Campy 53-teeth chainring). If this is so, then why do some third-party manufacturers of cranksets, such as FSA, offer the same exact cransets with differing BCD chain rings and spiders (FSA's standard is 130BCD, but you can get it in 135BCD, though it's relatively rare)? I assume that compatibilty issues are not the case (an FSA 130BCD chain ring will work fine on a Campy 10 groupo), so is it just incase some one might want to put their Campy chain rings on their FSA cranks and could only do such a thing with the 135BCD spider? And why did FSA choose to make 130BCD chainrings their standard anyway, do more of their customers seem to have Shimano users?
I made a number of assumptions, so if any of them are wrong, don't hesitate to throw it in my face. Thanks, this will clear up a lot of questions that haunt me in my dreams.
I made a number of assumptions, so if any of them are wrong, don't hesitate to throw it in my face. Thanks, this will clear up a lot of questions that haunt me in my dreams.