T
P
Peter Allen
Guest
"trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
there, that's better now
news:[email protected]...
> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
there, that's better now
T
Trg
Guest
Peter Allen wrote:
> "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
>> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
>> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
>
> there, that's better now
No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete is
to never announce the results in the header. It seriously
pisses off some folks who have taped the race and want to
watch it later. They'll call you all sorts of names and sick
the spambots on you (Voice of experience here.)
You've been duly warned.
> "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
>> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
>> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
>
> there, that's better now
No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete is
to never announce the results in the header. It seriously
pisses off some folks who have taped the race and want to
watch it later. They'll call you all sorts of names and sick
the spambots on you (Voice of experience here.)
You've been duly warned.
R
Robert Chung
Guest
trg wrote:
> Peter Allen wrote:
>> "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
>>> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
>>> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
>>
>> there, that's better now
>
> No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
> is to never announce the results in the header. It
> seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
> and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
> of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
> experience here.)
>
> You've been duly warned.
I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing. There
is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what there *is*
is complaining by the people who don't like it, and who
would like everyone else to believe that there is an
unwritten etiquette.
> Peter Allen wrote:
>> "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
>>> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
>>> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
>>
>> there, that's better now
>
> No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
> is to never announce the results in the header. It
> seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
> and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
> of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
> experience here.)
>
> You've been duly warned.
I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing. There
is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what there *is*
is complaining by the people who don't like it, and who
would like everyone else to believe that there is an
unwritten etiquette.
N
Nev Shea
Guest
"Robert Chung" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing.
> There is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what
> there *is* is complaining by the people who don't like it,
> and who would like everyone else to believe that there is
> an unwritten etiquette.
Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
podium in the message header.
NS
news:[email protected]:
> I'm an agnostic on the race-results-in-headers thing.
> There is no unwritten etiquette on this issue -- what
> there *is* is complaining by the people who don't like it,
> and who would like everyone else to believe that there is
> an unwritten etiquette.
Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
podium in the message header.
NS
R
Robert Chung
Guest
Nev Shea wrote:
>
> Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
> don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
> podium in the message header.
I stand corrected.
>
> Actually, because of the is complaining by the people who
> don't like it, the official RBR etiquette is to put the
> podium in the message header.
I stand corrected.
S
Sprintatbettyru
Guest
"trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Peter Allen wrote:
> > "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
> >> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
> >> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
> >
> > there, that's better now
>
> No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
> is to never announce the results in the header. It
> seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
> and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
> of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
> experience here.)
>
> You've been duly warned.
It'll **** of about 10 guys and big deal...**** 'em off.
Nobody who matters truly gives a **** whether the results
are there or not. If I had nothing else to do, I'd post
results in the header every chance I got!
> Peter Allen wrote:
> > "trg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> 1) Max Van Heeswijk (USPSPBBF)
> >> 2) Erik Zabel(T-Mobile)
> >> 3) Peter Wrolich (Gerolsteiner)
> >
> > there, that's better now
>
> No, actually that's worse. The unwritten R.B.R ettiquete
> is to never announce the results in the header. It
> seriously pisses off some folks who have taped the race
> and want to watch it later. They'll call you all sorts
> of names and sick the spambots on you (Voice of
> experience here.)
>
> You've been duly warned.
It'll **** of about 10 guys and big deal...**** 'em off.
Nobody who matters truly gives a **** whether the results
are there or not. If I had nothing else to do, I'd post
results in the header every chance I got!
