Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

MX Comp. ETAs

Started by Tim Izod · · Last activity · 2 posts · 411 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
25 June 2004
Last activity
25 June 2004
Original author
Tim Izod
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
411
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been looking to replace the crappy RS Jetts on my 2001 Kona
    & had been looking at replacing them with MX Comp ETAs[*] & I mentioned
    this in my LBS last night when hunting for cone spanners. Their response
    was to save my pennies & just get the plain MX Comps as they'd had a lot
    of problems and returns down to the ETA bits.

    Since they're pretty good and were recomending forks 40UKP
    cheaper I'm tempted to save the money and follow their advice.

    However, a bit of googling last night didn't turn up too many
    bad reports last night & great big bundles of praise.

    Has anybody here got any advice or opinions to offer? Or even
    suggestion of other forks to look at in a similar price bracket?

    [*] did have a slight concern about replacing 65mm travel forks with
    something longer. Google, Marzocchi's pages & a tape measure suggest the
    distance between bottom headset race and axle is comparible. (455mm on
    the Jett & 458/478mm for 85/105mm MX Comp.) My maths suggests that
    should't make for badness. Again if I'm wrong, please shout🙂
    --
    Tim. /\ /\
    O___O
    =\__|__/= meow.
    U

  2. Hi Tim

    I have some MX Comp ETA's (2003) and have had no problems whatsoever so far.
    They're great forks and the ETA is definately worthwhile having. I wouldn't
    buy any forks without some form of lockout now. My only critisism of
    Marzocchi is they don't do a remote lockout kit for the ETA.

    Mine are 105mm restricted to 85mm as I'm on a 1" steerer. Currently at
    Windwave having a 1 1/8" steerer pressed in as I have a new frame. As soon
    as I get them back, I'll remove the restrictor to get the full 105mm. :-)

    Ash

    "Tim Izod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've been looking to replace the crappy RS Jetts on my 2001 Kona
    & had been looking at replacing them with MX Comp ETAs[*] & I mentioned
    this in my LBS last night when hunting for cone spanners. Their response
    was to save my pennies & just get the plain MX Comps as they'd had a lot
    of problems and returns down to the ETA bits.

    Since they're pretty good and were recomending forks 40UKP
    cheaper I'm tempted to save the money and follow their advice.

    However, a bit of googling last night didn't turn up too many
    bad reports last night & great big bundles of praise.

    Has anybody here got any advice or opinions to offer? Or even
    suggestion of other forks to look at in a similar price bracket?

    [*] did have a slight concern about replacing 65mm travel forks with
    something longer. Google, Marzocchi's pages & a tape measure suggest the
    distance between bottom headset race and axle is comparible. (455mm on
    the Jett & 458/478mm for 85/105mm MX Comp.) My maths suggests that
    should't make for badness. Again if I'm wrong, please shout🙂
    --
    Tim. /\ /\
    O___O
    =\__|__/= meow.
    U

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.