~~My Transgendered Activities ~~



>Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>From: Orac [email protected]
>Date: 5/8/2004 9:20 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
>> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >From: Orac [email protected]
>> >Date: 5/7/2004 4:09 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>
>> >
>> >Maybe Jan thinks hyperbole refers only to the number of times something
>> >is mentioned.
>>
>> Your weaseling is noted.
>
>Your inability to understand context is noted.

LOL.

You goofed, period.

Jan
 
>Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>From: Orac [email protected]
>Date: 5/8/2004 9:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
>> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >From: Orac [email protected]
>> >Date: 5/7/2004 4:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>> >My mentioning the Nazis was nearly always appropriate
>>
>> Nothing was said about appropriate.
>
>Wrong, Jan

Nope, not wrong, not one word was said about appropriate. You are still
weaseling.

Had you not been so very eager to join David in the belittling game, you would
not be in this position.

Jan
 
>From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t

Your continual defense of Orac, is typical of the lenght the *gang* goes to, to
try to CONTROL AND BE RIGHT.

You both funked the course with your Mommy Momy but, but, but syndrome.

Jan
 
>Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>[email protected]
>Date: 5/8/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>
>"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 5, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>> >[email protected]
>> >Date: 5/5/2004 8:47 AM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >Anth, I do not respond to anything that the
>Woman-Whose-Name-I-Will-Not-Type
>> >publishes on her pages of sickness.
>>
>> However, that is new. Mark/Marla did plenty of replying, once upon a time.
>>
>> http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
>
>Jan, you are a f*cking *****

Sorry, you made your own bed, now lie in it.

Jan
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> When someone is in the habit of doing something *frequently*, and then
accuse
> others of it, to belittle, that's a hypocrite..
> It does NOT matter how or why Orac used it.
=====================

Hmmm....did Orac put on a false appearance of virtue or religion?


Main Entry: hyp·o·crite
Pronunciation: 'hi-p&-"krit
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Old French, from Late Latin
hypocrita,
from Greek hypokritEs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
- hypocrite adjective
=====================
Main Entry: vir·tue
Pronunciation: 'v&r-(")chü
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English virtu, from Old French, from Latin virtut-, virtus
strength, manliness, virtue, from vir man -- more at VIRILE
1 a : conformity to a standard of right : MORALITY b : a particular moral
excellence
2 plural : an order of angels -- see CELESTIAL HIERARCHY
3 : a beneficial quality or power of a thing
4 : manly strength or courage : VALOR
5 : a commendable quality or trait : MERIT
6 : a capacity to act : POTENCY
7 : chastity especially in a woman
- vir·tue·less /-(")chü-l&s/ adjective
- by virtue of or in virtue of : through the force of : by authority of
========================
Main Entry: re·li·gion
Pronunciation: ri-'li-j&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English religioun, from Latin religion-, religio
supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perhaps from religare
to restrain, tie back -- more at RELY
1 a : the state of a religious <a nun in her 20th year of religion> b (1) :
the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or
devotion to religious faith or observance
2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes,
beliefs, and practices
3 archaic : scrupulous conformity : CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith
- re·li·gion·less adjective
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>
> Your continual defense of Orac, is typical of the lenght the *gang* goes
to, to
> try to CONTROL AND BE RIGHT.
>
> You both funked the course with your Mommy Momy but, but, but syndrome.
>
> Jan
===================
Jan, you may not think this is the place for humor,
but you provide the most of it without even trying.
You operate from the ground basis of dealing with
small children in a daycare when you are interfacing
with college educated adults.

Must be why the 'gang' theory abounds (from years of dominating and
herding groups of submissive kiddies to the bathroom and playground.
"Eat"...."Sit"...."Don't talk"...."Speak"....."Get in line"
It's hysterical to see it acted out in a newsgroup of adults which
you can not control.
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >[email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 5, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >> >[email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/5/2004 8:47 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >Anth, I do not respond to anything that the
> >Woman-Whose-Name-I-Will-Not-Type
> >> >publishes on her pages of sickness.
> >>
> >> However, that is new. Mark/Marla did plenty of replying, once upon a
time.
> >>
> >> http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
> >
> >Jan, you are a f*cking *****
>
> Sorry, you made your own bed, now lie in it.
>
> Jan

What did she say?
Mark/Marla made Jan a f*cking *****?
Plonk!!
 
>Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>From: "Coleah" [email protected]
>Date: 5/8/2004 5:58 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <afgnc.53305$0H1.5136454@attbi_s54>
>
>
>"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >From: "Coleah" [email protected]
>> >
>>
>> Your selectiveness is touching.
>>
>> Jan
>
>Kinda thought you were 'touched' in so many ways.

Thanks.

Hope you feel good about yourself.

Jan
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: "Coleah" [email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 5:58 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <afgnc.53305$0H1.5136454@attbi_s54>
> >
> >
> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: "Coleah" [email protected]
> >> >
> >>
> >> Your selectiveness is touching.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >
> >Kinda thought you were 'touched' in so many ways.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Hope you feel good about yourself.
>
> Jan
==============

Yes indeed!
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Jan) wrote:

> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 9:19 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
> >
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 7, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >> >[email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/7/2004 1:46 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[email protected]...
> >
> >> >> At any rate it is far more that IIena, which makes you a hypocrite.
> >> >
> >> >No, it does not
> >>
> >> Of course it does.
> >>
> >> <snip more defense of Orac, who should have had the good sense not to have
> not posted what made him a hypocrite.>
>
> > I used the term
>
> Many more times that IIean, then make a snide remark about her using it.
> That's
> being a hypocrite.

Wrong, Jan. I criticized Ilena for using the term in an inappropriate
manner that was full of hyperbole, not for just using it. I know it's
hard for you to comprehend the difference, given that doing so would
force you to drop this excuse for belittling and bashing me (something
you criticize your enemies for all the time but feel quite free yourself
to do), but do try.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 7, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >[email protected]
> >Date: 5/7/2004 1:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/2/2004 1:23 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >> >> >Date: 5/1/2004 12:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >> >Message-id:
<[email protected]>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >> >> > Ilena Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 01 May 2004 14:29:05 GMT, Orac <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Davey's ... this website was created by silicone survivors ...
for
> >> >> >> silicone survivors ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The hyperbole to which I was referring was your bringing up the
Nazis.
> >> >>
> >> >> Orac google search Nazis 3,660.
> >> >
> >> >Actually, the number I got when I did the search was 1,130 (although
> >> >after I post that, the search will probably show one or two more).
> >> >
> >> >See:
> >> >
> >>
>http://www.google.com/groups?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&c2coff=1
> >> >&q=nazis+author%3Aorac&btnG=Search
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> IIena 10
> >> >>
> >> >> Orac, Orac, Orac.
> >> >>
> >> >> Foot in LYING mouth.
> >> >
> >> >Tsk, tsk, tsk. You didn't bother to look at the context of those posts
,
> >> >did you
> >>
> >> Umm, this tread isn't about what I did or didn't do.
> >>
> >> You claimed:
> >>
> >> >The hyperbole to which I was referring was your bringing up the Nazis.
> >>
> >> I proved, you are a hypocrite, as you postsings using the word are many
> >more
> >> than IIena.
> >
> >I pointed out to you
>
> More of the same defense for a *gang* member. Personally, I don't really
care
> how many times Orac has used the word.
>
> I just care that one is a hypocrite.
>
> Truth is Orac as usual just wanted to belittle.

His statement was far from being personally belittling.He was addressing the
improper use of the word 'Holocaust'.
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 9:19 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
> >
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 7, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >> >[email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/7/2004 1:46 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[email protected]...
> >
> >> >> At any rate it is far more that IIena, which makes you a hypocrite.
> >> >
> >> >No, it does not
> >>
> >> Of course it does.
> >>
> >> <snip more defense of Orac, who should have had the good sense not to
have
> not posted what made him a hypocrite.>
>
> > I used the term
>
> Many more times that IIean, then make a snide remark about her using it.
That's
> being a hypocrite.

No, it wasn't.However, since you disagree with Orac, you willcontinue to
maintin this point ad infinitum. IOW, it is pointless to argue with a stone.

>
> Plain and simple, no need to go into why you used it.

Wrong, since you obviously did not understand the context, which is
everything.
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >[email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 12:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <%[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 7, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >> >[email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/7/2004 1:46 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >> >> >Date: 5/2/2004 1:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >> >> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Orac is a hypocrite, he used the word Nazi 3,660 times to IIean's
> >10.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Actually, only 1,130 times over seven years, the vast majority of
them
> >> >> >in the narrow discussion of Holocaust history and in combatting
> >> >> >Holocaust denial on Usenet:
> >> >>
> >> >> Actually one get different answers depending on how one does the
> >search.
> >> >>
> >> >> At any rate it is far more that IIena, which makes you a hypocrite.
> >> >
> >> >No, it does not
> >>
> >> Of course it does.
> >>
> >> <snip more defense of Orac, who should have had the good sense not to
have
> >not
> >> posted what made him a hypocrite.>
> >
> >Jan, you should back up a moment and have a second opinion on this issue.
> >You persistence in calling Orac a hypocrite is making you look like a
fool.
>
> Typical *gang* response.
>
> When someone is in the habit of doing something *frequently*, and then
accuse
> others of it, to belittle, that's a hypocrite..

Your premise is wrong., he did not comment on the sick *****'s use of the
word to belittle her. He pointed out that her use of it was inappropriate.

> >
> >And, DO NOT snip anything I write
>
> Say what??? Do NOT even think of telling me what to do!!!

I guess when someone tells you something, you do not like it. But,you do it
all the time. You tell people to shut up, to leave, etc.

So, either you stop doing it, or expect more. And, if you do not like it,
you can leave.


> Now HEAR THIS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
>
> It does NOT matter how or why Orac used it.

Yes, it most certainly does. However, you are probably too stupid to
understand it. And, I am belittling you.
 
"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>
> Your continual defense of Orac, is typical of the lenght the *gang* goes
to, to
> try to CONTROL AND BE RIGHT.

Nope., It is a demonstratioon of our desire to help educate you. However,
your behavir is clearly demonstrable of someone who is not educable.

> You both funked the course with your Mommy Momy but, but, but syndrome.


Please do not be self-referential.
 
On Sun, 09 May 2004 12:15:07 GMT, Orac <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
>> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >From: Orac [email protected]
>> >Date: 5/8/2004 9:19 AM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>> >
>> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
>> >> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 7, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>> >> >[email protected]
>> >> >Date: 5/7/2004 1:46 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> >news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> >> >> At any rate it is far more that IIena, which makes you a hypocrite.
>> >> >
>> >> >No, it does not
>> >>
>> >> Of course it does.
>> >>
>> >> <snip more defense of Orac, who should have had the good sense not to have
>> not posted what made him a hypocrite.>
>>
>> > I used the term
>>
>> Many more times that IIean, then make a snide remark about her using it.
>> That's
>> being a hypocrite.
>
>Wrong, Jan. I criticized Ilena for using the term in an inappropriate
>manner that was full of hyperbole, not for just using it. I know it's
>hard for you to comprehend the difference,


But I believe that Jan often *does* comprehend the difference.She just
pretends that she does not in order to belittle.


Aloha,

Rich


> given that doing so would
>force you to drop this excuse for belittling and bashing me (something
>you criticize your enemies for all the time but feel quite free yourself
>to do), but do try.

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Jan) wrote:

> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >Date: 5/8/2004 9:20 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
> >
> >> >Subject: Re: ~~~My Transgendered Activities ~~~
> >> >From: Orac [email protected]
> >> >Date: 5/7/2004 4:09 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Maybe Jan thinks hyperbole refers only to the number of times something
> >> >is mentioned.
> >>
> >> Your weaseling is noted.
> >
> >Your inability to understand context is noted.
>
> LOL.
>
> You goofed, period.

Jan must be running out of variations of the same old bogus attack to
belittle me. Certainly she has utterly failed to demonstrate any
hypocrisy on my part. However, in her failure, she certainly has
demonstrated some hypocrisy of her own, for instance, her constant
belittling of me, despite her frequent past statements that it is
"wrong" to belittle. ;-)

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 9, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote:

> "Jan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...

> > Many more times that IIean, then make a snide remark about her using it.
> That's
> > being a hypocrite.
>
> No, it wasn't.However, since you disagree with Orac, you willcontinue to
> maintin this point ad infinitum. IOW, it is pointless to argue with a stone.

Indeed. Arguing with Jan is much like arguing with Ilena that way.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Jan) wrote:

> >From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 8, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>
> Your continual defense of Orac, is typical of the lenght the *gang* goes to,
> to
> try to CONTROL AND BE RIGHT.

I have no interest in "controlling" you, and I already AM right. ;-)

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back