"Mark Thompson" <
[email protected] (change warm for hot)> wrote in message
news:<
[email protected]>...
> Didn't know what to make of this one. Seen at 6.45pm (so well dark). Was wearing a fl. jacket but
> with no lights. As I got closer I noticed he did have lights in the mesh sidepocket of his bag,
> but hadn't bothered turning them on and putting them on his bike!
Come on, what sort of 'stealth cyclist' is it who wears a flourescent jacket! I also notice that you
were even able to tell what he had in the pockets of his bags so he seems very unstealthy to me!
It seems to me that in order to be a genuinely stealthy cyclist one needs to put at least £100 worth
of high power halogen lighting onto ones bike. I find doing so renders me (supposedly) invisible to
many drivers. Wierd thing is drivers seem to have no problem seeing unlit cyclists - this must be
the case as they are always reporing seeing cyclists riding without lights!
Perhaps BUPA should re-run their TV ad where they say 'the human eye can see a candle flame 5 miles
away' adding 'but cannot see a cyclist 20 yards away even when they are dressed like something from
outer space'!
By the way, I wonder were the term 'Stealth cyclist' comes from, maybe the Sun (originator of the
term 'Lycra Nazis' firt seen in Jeremy Clarkson rant) or perhaps the Daily Mail who it seems
introduced the term 'Lycra Lout' to the English language?