MJuric wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:59:46 -0400, "HBW" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I raced a few triathlons 15 years ago and am trying to get back into it. I was wondering why I see
>>triathlon bikes with 650 c wheels instead of 700's. Is there an advantage to this?
>>
> My understanding is they are lighter and therefore accelerate quicker. Not being a bike guy
> however I often wondered about the advantages here myself as the equition for calculating
> rolling resistance is directly related to wheel size. Larger bing better. Thus I can see teh
> advantages of a 650C on uphills, less weight to carry up, and in a sprinting or cornering
> based course. But aren't most of the courses mostly flat? Are there aotehr advantages to
> 650CC wheels?
The "lightness" of the wheels isn't really a huge issue when accelerating, since you have to spin
the smaller wheel up to a higher RPM to reach the same speed (essentially negating any "advantage").
Others think there's an aerodyamic advantage, but in the end since the rider has to end up in the
same position no matter what the size of the wheel, the frame has to be taller, again, pretty much
cancelling any advantage.
The one advantage of the small tires is that the front end can be lower if you need that to achieve
proper positioning. But if you look at most of the 650c tri bikes out there, you'll see them set up
with a riser stem and numerous spacers to get the bars up where they would have been with a 700c
wheel. It's a potentially great thing for some shorter triathletes, or those who can tolerate a VERY
low position.
The down side is the availability of tires. If I were going to build myself a "small wheeled tri
bike", I'd probably design it around the 26" MTB rims instead. There are many more choices for rims
and tires.
Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame