Road Cycling · Public discussion

nice SUV article

Started by Monty Montgomer · · Last activity · 220 posts · 10,958 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 January 2003
Last activity
2 February 2003
Original author
Monty Montgomer
Posts
220
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
10,958
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 161–180 of 220
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris Phillipo said:


    Somewhere between 100K and infinity you failed to understand what per mile means. It is not my
    place to make up for your failed education.

    IOW, you're justifying those who put out much more pollution in total, with the defense that they
    put out slightly less pollution per mile.

    Your arguments are often absurd, but this one reaches new depths!

    --
    Frank Krygowski [email hidden]

    Your the one ignoring those would put out more pollution total. Guess how many years me and 50 other
    people would have to drive to burn the amount of fuel one trans Atlantic flight burns. You're worse
    than Mike Vandy-man for taking on meaningless causes. Since you can not even find unilateral support
    for your position in a BICYCLING news group I'm fairly secure in the knowledge you won't ever make a
    difference in the real world.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Zoot Katz said:

    I wonder if Detroit's lobbyists have any say in setting those standards

    Inconceivable. That would lead to a situation where they spend money on annual cosmetic changes
    and don't put in safety features like ABS as standard.

    Guy

    You'd think we were living in the Regan years or somehting.

    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Yes I'm quite sure that stale gas, carbon deposits, internal engine case condensation, coolant
    system corrosion and just general rust and deterioration caused by stagnant moisture kills a
    car much faster than using it.

    hahahahahahahahahhaaaaaahhhh.

    Unless the gasoline additives come out of solution or decompose, there's no such thing as stale
    gas. Since you've decided to bring it up: how quickly does gas go "stale"? What if it's diesel?
    Or LNG/propane??


    Ever heard of fuel stabilizer there big fella? Do you even know what it's used for? Why don't you
    put your lawn mower away with a full tank of gas and see if it starts in the spring. Speaking of
    lawn mowers, when are you fanatics going to outlaw them? They polute 5-10 times as much per gallon
    than any car.

    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    They need to make some that look like the cars in the movie Artificial Intelligence. These small
    cars look nice and are small enough that you could easily get 50 mpg from one. Instead, we get
    ugly little cars.

    A Jetta TDI looks acceptable to most people and gets 50 mpg on the highway. What's even better is
    that it has 150 ft-lb of torque at only 2000rpm, so you can motor over mountain passes on cruise
    control without downshifing or slowing any. A lot of "powerful" cars won't even do that.

    Of course, the Golf and Beetle are essentially the same car, but they don't do quite as well
    (say10% less) because the Jetta's aerodynamics are better.

    Matt O.

    For that matter a Cummins diesel can get better mileage than most gas burning cars. So lets mandate
    that ever SUV gets one and a 6 speed transmission. I'm all for that! Just make sure the gov't
    subsidizes the extra cost 🙂

    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  5. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Jones said:


    "Frank Krygowski" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I think vehicles which are intended for passenger transport (or, more realistically, mere
    driver transport) should have maximum weights, to reduce lethality in collisions with smaller
    vehicles.


    I frequently see F-350 crew cab trucks being driven with no passengers and no payload. I also
    see the corresponding trucks from GM and Dodge hauling around one person. There are a lot of 4
    door trucks on the road now because they can carry quite a few people and have good payload
    capacity when needed. I very seldom see these truck pulling a trailer or hauling anything, but
    they don't get singled out like SUVs.

    Why is it that this is OK, but if someone does the same thing with an SUV, they are attacked as
    being inconsiderate and wasteful?

    People are, very logically, attacking the larger problem first. Oversized and unjustified SUVs are
    a much more common problem than oversized and unjustified pickups. (Around here, anyway, most
    pickups actually are used for work.)

    The pickup is the best selling car in North America. Do explain your math.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  6. Chris Phillipo said:

    Ever heard of fuel stabilizer there big fella? Do you even know what it's used for? Why don't you
    put your lawn mower away with a full tank of gas and see if it starts in the spring. Speaking of
    lawn mowers,

    I've never had that sort of problem with "leftover" fuel stored over a summer (in the snowthrower
    tank) or winter (boat outboard premix). In fact, I've used gas three years old in my outboard
    without any problem.

    Never really understood just what the fuel stabilizer was supposed to
    do.

    Quoted message said:

    when are you fanatics going to outlaw them? They polute 5-10 times as much per gallon than
    any car.

    I think CA (of course) was trying to outlaw them or reduce their use in some way; or perhaps has?

    Lawn mowers and small engine machinery in general are very signficant polluters.

    SMH

  7. Chris Phillipo said:

    me

    Quoted message said:

    him

    Quoted message said:


    > Yes I'm quite sure that stale gas, carbon deposits, internal engine case condensation,
    > coolant system corrosion and just general rust and deterioration caused by stagnant moisture
    > kills a car much faster than using it.

    hahahahahahahahahhaaaaaahhhh.

    Unless the gasoline additives come out of solution or decompose, there's no such thing as
    stale gas. Since you've decided to bring it up: how quickly does gas go "stale"? What if it's
    diesel? Or LNG/propane??


    Ever heard of fuel stabilizer there big fella? Do you even know what it's used for?

    Gasoline additives are not limited to fuel stabilizer. If you need some help on the subject,
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a nice web page you could start with:
    <http://www-erd.llnl.gov/Fuelsofthefuture/generalinfo.html>.

    Doing your homework for you, i find octane enhancers, volatility controllers, oxygenates, and
    surfactants to be the big fuel additives besides stabilizers. Nothing i didn't know already, sorry.

    Do yo know what fuel stabilizer does? Of course not. It largely refers to inhibitting olefin
    catalysis, basically preventing ... gunk. The catalysis is temperature related - warmer = faster. It
    can also refer to moisture control, which aggrevating factors are strongly correlated with circadian
    thermal cycling, relative humidity, dewpoint and gas cap integrity.

    Now, for some reason _you_ brought up "stale gas". I specifically asked you: how long does that
    take. You don't know, do you??

    Well, there's no specific answer, like "983 hours," but the general consensus i found to be
    somewhere around 3 months, less under high ambient temperature conditions.

    In the context of this discussion -- a car driven ~4/30 days, which is roughly once/week (actually
    twice every other week) , and as i amplified in anther post, roughly a tank every 2~3 weeks, it's
    clear that stale fuel is irrelevant to the issue. From other posters it's clear that it's irrelevant
    to most cyclecommuters.

    I also asked you about diesel. That was a gimme! Poorly amended diesel fuel, if contaminated with
    moisture, can suffer from "sick diesel" syndrome, a condition where microbes actually grow in the
    bottom of the tank. Very annoying when the bacterial mat shakes loose and gets stuck in the fuel
    line or filter.

    Quoted message said:

    Why don't you put your lawn mower away with a full tank of gas and see if it starts in the spring.
    Speaking of lawn mowers, when are you fanatics going to outlaw them? They polute 5-10 times as
    much per gallon than any car.

    "... starts in the spring" There's that 3, well, 6 month thing... somewhat more than 2~3 weeks...

    Actually, the USEPA is leaning v.v.heavily towards imposing emissions controlling technology on new
    lawnmowers. I don't keep up on the issue, but i _think_ they're already doing it.

    Of course, being a real man, with massive ripply quadraceps from cyclecommuting, i prefer to use the
    classic human powered reel mower, both for excercise and its superior cut. The quiet tickticktick of
    the blades is much more soothing than a briggs and stratton one-lunger.

    Didn't you tell me you were going to killfile me yesterday? ahh ... here it is ":keep pulling
    yourself to your own tune you won't be wasting any more of my time from my kill file." sheesh, that
    wasn't even 24 hours!

    or perhaps i should say --"You like me! You rilly rilly like meee!!!"

    .max

    --
    the part of <[email hidden]> was played by maxwell monningh 8-p

  8. Quoted message said:

    "max" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I think we made a mistake when we went to dual/diagonal brake hydraulics, seat belts and
    telescopic steering wheels. And don't get me started about laminated tempered glass.

    There are still a great many people that don't want airbags and ABS, especially if they are forced
    to buy a 2 seater econo box, where do they put the kids, in front of the airbag and turn it off with
    the disabling switch? Makes you wonder why you spent $500 on the bag then doesn't it. Look how much
    fighting goes on about DRLs, there are actually kits available to disable them on most model cars if
    it's not easily done from the fuse box, and those are just friggin head lights. You would think that
    an American would know all about freedom of choice.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  9. "Chris Phillipo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Jones said:


    "Frank Krygowski" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
    > I think vehicles which are intended for passenger transport (or,


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > realistically, mere driver transport) should have maximum weights,


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > reduce lethality in collisions with smaller vehicles.
    I frequently see F-350 crew cab trucks being driven with no passengers and no payload. I also
    see the corresponding trucks from GM and Dodge hauling around one person. There are a lot of 4
    door trucks on the road now because they can carry quite a few people and have good payload
    capacity when needed. I very seldom see these truck pulling a trailer or hauling anything, but
    they don't get singled out like SUVs.

    Why is it that this is OK, but if someone does the same thing with an SUV, they are attacked
    as being inconsiderate and wasteful?

    People are, very logically, attacking the larger problem first. Oversized and unjustified SUVs
    are a much more common problem than oversized and unjustified pickups. (Around here, anyway,
    most pickups actually are used for work.)

    The pickup is the best selling car in North America. Do explain your math.


    I see close to twice as many pickups on the road as SUVs.

    Either his math is strange, or the demographics of his area are a lot different than where I live.

  10. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris Phillipo said:

    I suppose there are many auto enthusiasts that you you are laughable, what's your point?

    Proofread before you post, Chris. Or get someone to do it for you.

    You wreak of irony.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  11. Chris Phillipo <[email hidden]> wrote: [...]
    : Might as well, the sooner we use up all the oil the sooner alternative fuels will be economically
    : feasible, and not a day before.

    Oh, of course. That is precisely why there is no coal left anywhere on the planet. No wood either.

    I bow before your superior logic.

    --
    'People think I'm insane because I am frowning all the time All day long I think of things
    but nothing seems to satisfy' 'Make a joke and I will sigh And you will laugh and I will
    cry' -Black Sabbath

  12. Chris Phillipo said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am a year-round cycle commuter,...

    Quoted message said:

    You must feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

    Yep, especially after a nice ride on the bike.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  13. Chris Phillipo said:

    No, I'm saying that any fanatic preching to others and suggesting that their choice of vehicle be
    banned from sale is a hypocrite if they own one themselves.

    Since I don't own an SUV that's me off the hook, I guess.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  14. Stephen Harding said:

    If being an environmental green is so important, then choose a small economy car, or ride a bike.

    That ignores the fact that we all have to live on the same planet, though.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  15. Chris Phillipo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ever read "Unsafe At Any Speed?"

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, do you realize that nader had a hard on for the corvair and completely ignored dozens of
    infinitly more dangerous cars on the road?

    And? The rear suspension of the Corvair was similar to many other cars, including the Triump Herald,
    and all cars with rear suspension of that design were prone to oversteer and rollover. Actually my
    boss has a large scar on his head from a Herald rollover incident.

    Quoted message said:

    Do you realize he manufactured roll over demonstrations just like his buddies at consumer reports?

    Terribly easy to do with those cars. Did he also arrange the demonstrations of chest cavity
    penetration and broken necks from steering column intrusion, using live subjects, or was it the car
    manufacturers who did that?

    Quoted message said:

    He's a god damn stooge and deserves no respsect.

    He made a lot of pertinent observations about the car industry, most of which they would rather
    have kept quiet. Ultimately he's a lawyer, and all lawyers are at least part weasel, but he did
    some good work.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  16. Chris Phillipo said:

    Here we go with the made up unsubstantiated statistics, a sure sign that you have run out of
    things to say.

    Absolutely. Here's one the State of Utah made up:

    "when Utah Department of Health conducted a review of every paralysis case reported to hospitals in
    the state, it found that even though rollovers were rare, they accounted for three quarters of all
    traffic-related cases of paralysis in the state. Traffic accidents, in turn, accounted for half of
    all cases of paralysis by any cause, including illness, falls and shootings. Researchers in Arkansas
    have found nearly the same rate of rollover-related paralysis."

    ( quoted in High & Mighty and elsewhere )

    Here's one that a bloke called Ben Best invented:

    "Drivers of Sport-Utility Vehicles (SUVs) are especially vulnerable to fatal rollovers. Rollover
    accidents account for only 3% of all U.S. motor-vehicle accidents, but they cause nearly a third of
    all vehicle-occupant fatalities. And SUV occupant is 3 times as likely to die as a result of a
    rollover than an occupant of a passenger car. "

    ( benbest.comcauses.html )

    Some more made up by the Spine Research Institute of San Diego:

    "In addition to the differential mass effects which provide an injury risk advantage to occupants of
    heavier vehicles, SUVs tend to have higher frame rail chassis which, in addition to the fact that
    they are more aggressive than the more crashworthy unibody construction of most modern passenger
    cars, tend to ride over the door sills of passenger cars in side impacts. This allows for greater
    penetration of the occupant cage with obviously more dire effects for the occupants of that car. In
    fact, the risk for the occupants of a passenger car of dying in a near-side side impact, when the
    bullet vehicle is an SUV, truck, or van, is about 40+ times that of the driver of the SUV, truck, or
    van. In the case of two passenger cars, the risk is only 6 times for the side-struck driver."

    ( srisd.comeletter2.3.pdf )

    Oh, [censored] it, the whole /world/ is making up this stuff - no wonder the poor beleagured SUV drivers
    feel so hard done by. Just because the facts support them, the anti-SUV people think they are
    right! [censored].

    Quoted message said:

    Ah, the nazi never thinks he's the bad guy syndrome. What am I trying to forced YOU to drive?

    Ah, well, I'd love to stay and chat but I must go an annexe the Sudetenland.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  17. Mark Jones said:

    Adding all of this safety equipment costs money and not everyone want to be forced to buy it. That
    is why it is still optional on a lot of vehicles.

    While changing the cosmetics every year or so is crucial to the functioning of the vehicle so must
    be buried in the cost. After all, changing the shape of the headlamp cluster will prevent thousands
    of accidents every year, whereas any competent driver can stop on a wet road without ABS.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  18. Mark Jones said:

    A stylish car that gets very high mileage is entirely possible. Why do so many of these cars look
    like a shoebox with wheels?

    Well, there's the $64 question I guess. Probably because the boxy shape yields most interior space
    per unit volume. But what do I know? I drive the squarest car known to man!

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  19. Chris Phillipo said:

    Unless I miss my guess, people who need a "town car" don't live in "town", those that live in
    "town" should be using mass transit.

    But then you might have to sit next to someone smelly. People who live in towns and cities can
    perform incredible mental gymnastics to prove that the perfectly satisfactory mass transit system
    which passes by their door isn't suitable for them, although it would suit everyone else which
    translates as: get on the bus and make room for my car).

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  20. Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Inconceivable. That would lead to a situation where they spend money on annual cosmetic changes
    and don't put in safety features like ABS as standard.

    "Chris Phillipo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You'd think we were living in the Regan years or somehting.

    Cars advanced more in terms of emissions control during the Reagan years than any other period. A
    1980 American car was hardly better than a 1960s car. Most still had carburators, mechanical
    distributors, and tacked-on, unreliable emissions gear. But by 1988 most cars had modern,
    electronically controlled and integrated fuel injection, ignition, and emissions systems.

    Matt O.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 1 guest ·0 bots ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.