Not my Xmas presents



alienator

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2004
12,596
310
0
No these things are just things I'm testing for a few months. They are pretty spiffy, though. Brake real nice w/ Swissstop green pads. Tires center up dead easy on the rims. Of course they're sickly light. The Tufos aren't my idea or my choice: the company sent 'em with the wheels. FWIW, the stem/bars on the bike are leftovers from riding with injured neck and back. I'm too lazy to change 'em out before I get my new frame.

As it happens, my Xmas present to myself will also have wheels, although those wheels aren't quite as light. That present is the last pic.
 
I prefer Ducati myself, but the Tuono is a nice bike. :)

(selling all that Nike Puma Adidas Nokia Sony Castor Oil is obviously paying off)
 
matagi said:
I prefer Ducati myself, but the Tuono is a nice bike. :)

(selling all that Nike Puma Adidas Nokia Sony Castor Oil is obviously paying off)

Man, what's with this Tuono stuff? This is a Tuono:
Aprilia%20Tuono%201000R.jpg


This, what I'm getting, is an RSV1000R:
obr2.jpg


I used to be Duck guy, and this time around I came real close to getting another Duck 888, like I had before. Then I remembered how high maintenance it was. If I won the lottery, though, there is one and only one Ducati I would buy: the Desmosedici D16RR. Man, that is one *****in' Camaro.
d16rr-02.jpg
 
kytyree said:
Alienator, for the 595 are you getting the Origin or Ultra version?

The Origin. I rode an Origin for a while, and it were just fine.
 
That frame is on the short list when I replace my current frame, probably later this year.

Since you have ridden it what are your thoughts on the integrated seatmast?

I haven't ridden the 595 but I think I would prefer the Origin. Sometime it would be interesting to compare the two or something like the Extreme Power frame to their respective counterparts. I have always been curious about how much different the rides would be for frames made stiffer like those.
 
kytyree said:
That frame is on the short list when I replace my current frame, probably later this year.

Since you have ridden it what are your thoughts on the integrated seatmast?

I haven't ridden the 595 but I think I would prefer the Origin. Sometime it would be interesting to compare the two or something like the Extreme Power frame to their respective counterparts. I have always been curious about how much different the rides would be for frames made stiffer like those.

Well, I can say that I don't know that the seatmast contributed anything to the ride. A Look rep said the seatmast is intended to provide better comfort and that it's not a feature that's supposed to increase stiffness.

I very much liked the way the 595 felt. On a 21% grade, it seemed to climb very well, but I likely attribute that to a geometry that better suited me: taller headtube; less steep head tube angle. I was just more comfortable. The less steep head tube angle (73 vs. 73.75 for my current ride, with the same fork offset) also made for a more comfortably steering bike. From the climb, I can't see how I'd need a stiffer bike. I'm no powerhouse, but on that climb, I generally put out 1000-1200 W for the steep section (1/4 mile long.). Thor Hushovd would certainly stress a frame more than me.

Frankly, I like the seatmast for its aesthetics. I also like it because one leg is very sensitive to saddle misalignment. 20 fractures over a few years and accidents have left my leg with a creative geometry. If the seat ain't pointed in the right direction, my leg broadcasts that to me.

I do think Look has produced the best solution in a seatmast: it's plenty adjustable for height; it fixes the saddle in the right direction; and it's mucho caliente. I could care less about resale value. I buy bikes to ride, not as interim seats for my ass between purchases.

The only things I didn't like about the bike were:
  1. The Dura Ace components. While they shifted ok, the feel was totally craptastic.
  2. The bike was white.
  3. The Ksyrium ES wheels: totally overblown, uninspiring wheels.