There's a feature in this week's Cycling Weekly about how long your longest ride needs to be. Roger Hammond says he prefers to do 5 - 5.5 hours at a higher pace than 7+ hour rides like most pros.
With this in mind and having a chaotic schedule (young family and business to run) I'm curious what people think of this method. I'm doing a very hilly century in June but will struggle to fit more than a couple of 6-7 hour rides in. By doing 4 -4.5 hour rides at a higher pace (using Powertap as pacing tool) will I still be prepared for such a long ride?
The rest of my rides are SST and L4 during the week. I'm making good progress with raising FTP (330 watts/70.5 kg up from 300 watts/76kg in December) but am concerned about 'lasting the distance'.
All advice appreciated.
With this in mind and having a chaotic schedule (young family and business to run) I'm curious what people think of this method. I'm doing a very hilly century in June but will struggle to fit more than a couple of 6-7 hour rides in. By doing 4 -4.5 hour rides at a higher pace (using Powertap as pacing tool) will I still be prepared for such a long ride?
The rest of my rides are SST and L4 during the week. I'm making good progress with raising FTP (330 watts/70.5 kg up from 300 watts/76kg in December) but am concerned about 'lasting the distance'.
All advice appreciated.