Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material

[Bill C]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive

Quoted:
He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
2002.

Enjoy
Bill C

 

[[email protected]]

Bill C wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> Quoted:
> He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
> 2002.
>

dumbass,


was he wearing a helmet ?

 

[Bill C]

On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> > Quoted:
> > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
> > 2002.dumbass,
>
> was he wearing a helmet ?

Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
Bill C

 

[Bill C]

On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> > Quoted:
> > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
> > 2002.dumbass,
>
> was he wearing a helmet ?

Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
Bill C

 

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Bill C wrote:
> > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
> >
> > > Quoted:
> > > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
> > > 2002.dumbass,
> >
> > was he wearing a helmet ?
>
> Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
> Bill C

The typical guy reponse was provided by the employer, who argued that
the injuries weren't that bad. No word on whether their secondary line
was "and hey, who wouldn't want that problem?"

Counterpoint: he was in a coma for two months! I'd say the case for a
severe brain injury is presumptive.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email protected] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

 

[Davey Crockett]

"Bill C" <[email protected]> writes:

> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> Quoted:
> He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
> 2002.
>

And that's the judge, if memory serves Davey correctly, who is
president of the High Court Appelate Division

Forget the Appelate/Plaintif. It's thr judge who has suffered the
brain damage


--
Le vent à Dos
Davey Crockett [No 4Q to reply]

 

[RonSonic]

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:03:51 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Bill C wrote:
>> > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
>> > > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>> >
>> > > Quoted:
>> > > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
>> > > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his marriage in January
>> > > 2002.dumbass,
>> >
>> > was he wearing a helmet ?
>>
>> Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
>> Bill C
>
>The typical guy reponse was provided by the employer, who argued that
>the injuries weren't that bad. No word on whether their secondary line
>was "and hey, who wouldn't want that problem?"
>
>Counterpoint: he was in a coma for two months! I'd say the case for a
>severe brain injury is presumptive.

He was faking it.

Ron