In article <
[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
> RS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected] says...
>> >
>> >
>> >Ron Schiller writes:
>> >
>> >> What kind of jockey wheels are these? They're on a DuraAce
>> 7700ss
>> >> and the writing says "DuraAce sealed bearing pulley" on the
lower
>> >> but they are different then most other jockey wheels I've
seen.
>> >
>> > http://www.rickschiller.com/der7700.jpg
>> > http://www.rickschiller.com/der7700_.jpg
>> >
>> >Excellent photos. Keep up the good work. Meanwhile, I'm sure
you
>> can
>> >find the answer at better bicycle shops.
>> >
>> >Jobst Brandt
>>
>> Amazing what one can do with a $150 camera these days.
>
>Yesbut, your lighting betrays your professionalism.
>
>At a guess, you turned off the built-in flash (which would have
>hilariously overexposed the derailer) and used a hot light, or as us
>cheap photographers call them, "halogen work lights, $15 with stand
on
>sale."
>
>--
>Ryan Cousineau [email protected] http://www.wiredcola.com/
>"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
>to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
Ok, I'm busted, I was a professional photographer but have dropped
it. Lighting is all judgement calls, Halogen is as you say the $15 choice
and not a good one because they have a very low Kelvin temperature
and will shift colors very warm to red. You can compensate to get
neutral tones but few amateurs would have a clue. I used the cheesy
on camera flash on the back side photo of the derailleur, front photo
no flash, all natural light. No reflectors, no nothing. Its all
judgement calls and seeing the light. I never shot digitally as a pro,
always used film. My original comment stands, its a 4M $150 Canon
digital. Amazing how convenient its all gotten. And a little Photoshop
tweaking never hurts. EBay here I come . . . . .