J
Jim Flom
Guest
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email protected]> schreef in bericht
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Bill C wrote:
>> > How about you tell us how we reconcile our beliefs in human rights
>> and
>> > democracy in todays world? Sharia law is diametrically opposed to
>> > western values, yet Canada wants to impose it on Muslim females. The
>> > slaughter in Africa is based aroung the tribal warfare Henry keeps
>> > bringing up, but as PC North Americans and Europeans we have to
>> accept
>> > these cultures as equal to ours.
>> > Please tell me how you people can reconcile your values with
>> > supporting these culturews including China and Cuba.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dumbass -
>>
>> You don't reconcile those values.
>>
>> You understand that you can't make other cultures accept your values
>> any more than other cultures can make your culture accept their values.
>> K. Gringioni.
>
> Nationalism almost inevitably implies moral relativism. The conflict for
> the
> nationalist is that he desperately wants to be a moral absolutist, while
> he
> really isn't: deep down he is convinced that right and wrong are
> geographically defined. The typical solution is as logical as it is scary.
> It is to make sure that as much of the world as possible belongs to the
> same
> place, i.e. expand the nation to any practical limit.
I like your point but it seems to me you are saying the opposite -- that the
nationalist desperately wants to be a relativist (for appearances?), but
deep down is an absolutist, defined by his exportation of his geographically
defined values.
news:[email protected]...
> "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email protected]> schreef in bericht
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Bill C wrote:
>> > How about you tell us how we reconcile our beliefs in human rights
>> and
>> > democracy in todays world? Sharia law is diametrically opposed to
>> > western values, yet Canada wants to impose it on Muslim females. The
>> > slaughter in Africa is based aroung the tribal warfare Henry keeps
>> > bringing up, but as PC North Americans and Europeans we have to
>> accept
>> > these cultures as equal to ours.
>> > Please tell me how you people can reconcile your values with
>> > supporting these culturews including China and Cuba.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dumbass -
>>
>> You don't reconcile those values.
>>
>> You understand that you can't make other cultures accept your values
>> any more than other cultures can make your culture accept their values.
>> K. Gringioni.
>
> Nationalism almost inevitably implies moral relativism. The conflict for
> the
> nationalist is that he desperately wants to be a moral absolutist, while
> he
> really isn't: deep down he is convinced that right and wrong are
> geographically defined. The typical solution is as logical as it is scary.
> It is to make sure that as much of the world as possible belongs to the
> same
> place, i.e. expand the nation to any practical limit.
I like your point but it seems to me you are saying the opposite -- that the
nationalist desperately wants to be a relativist (for appearances?), but
deep down is an absolutist, defined by his exportation of his geographically
defined values.