OT: Giants on track to upset Pats after 1st period!

[Jay]

Didn't the Giants get the memo?

They are supposed to just roll over!

J.

 

[Hank Wirtz]

On Dec 29, 6:06 pm, "Jay" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Didn't the Giants get the memo?
>
> They are supposed to just roll over!
>
> J.

Quarter. This is football, not hockey.

 

[Bill Sornson]

Jay wrote:
> Didn't the Giants get the memo?
>
> They are supposed to just roll over!
>
> J.

Don't worry, the refs will find a way to let the Patriots win. (Already
tried with that lame "illegal contact" call.)

Bill "afraid the fix is in but hoping the Giants can overcome it" S.

 

[[email protected]]

On Dec 29, 9:06 pm, "Jay" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Didn't the Giants get the memo?
>
> They are supposed to just roll over!
>
> J.

Pats win! Pats get it done in the 4th quarter. Sweet 16!

 

[Bill Sornson]

[email protected] wrote:

> Pats win! Pats get it done in the 4th quarter. Sweet 16!

Will there be an asterisk for the games they won by cheating?

Bill "there should be" S.

 

[[email protected]]

On Dec 30, 12:02 am, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Will there be an asterisk for the games they won by cheating?
>
> Bill "there should be" S.

There should be an asterisk for that sweatshirt Belachick was wearing
tonight..

 

[still just me]

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:27:04 -0800 (PST), Hank Wirtz
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Dec 29, 6:06 pm, "Jay" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Didn't the Giants get the memo?
>>
>> They are supposed to just roll over!
>>
>> J.
>
>Quarter. This is football, not hockey.

Yeah, if it was hockey there'd be legal battery on fellow players
right on the field. Football players are more civilized - they commit
crimes only off field where they belong.

 

[Ozark Bicycle]

On Dec 30, 1:02 am, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Pats win!  Pats get it done in the 4th quarter.  Sweet 16!
>
> Will there be an asterisk for the games they won by cheating?
>

Yeah, they sure went right down the tubes after Jets HC Mangini turned
'em in to the NFL, eh? They probably would have gone undefeated if
they didn't get caught....

 

[Bill Sornson]

[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 30, 12:02 am, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Will there be an asterisk for the games they won by cheating?
>>
>> Bill "there should be" S.
>
> There should be an asterisk for that sweatshirt Belachick was wearing
> tonight..

Has he ever NOT worn that ugly thing?

 

[[email protected]]

On Dec 30, 12:43 pm, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Has he ever NOT worn that ugly thing?

Seriously??

No wonder they win every game. Dressed like that, he has to. He's
like, I don't need no stinkin sleeves. Like weightlifting class from
1983.

 

[Bill Sornson]

[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 30, 12:43 pm, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Has he ever NOT worn that ugly thing?
>
> Seriously??
>
> No wonder they win every game. Dressed like that, he has to. He's
> like, I don't need no stinkin sleeves. Like weightlifting class from
> 1983.

I thought it was just an old ratty hooded sweatshirt:

http://www.foulballs.net/2007/09/bill-belichek-will-have-to-wait-on-that.html

Whatever, the guy is dull and classless IMO. Good coach, obviously, but a
cold grouch...

 

[[email protected]]

On Dec 30, 3:11 pm, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 12:43 pm, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Has he ever NOT worn that ugly thing?
>
> > Seriously??
>
> > No wonder they win every game. Dressed like that, he has to. He's
> > like, I don't need no stinkin sleeves. Like weightlifting class from
> > 1983.
>
> I thought it was just an old ratty hooded sweatshirt:
>
> http://www.foulballs.net/2007/09/bill-belichek-will-have-to-wait-on-t...

That is formalwear compared to what he was wearing last night.

 

[Michael Press]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Pats win! Pats get it done in the 4th quarter. Sweet 16!
>
> Will there be an asterisk for the games they won by cheating?

Having trouble coming up with the vig?

--
Michael Press

 

[Michael Press]

In article
<[email protected]>,
still just me <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:27:04 -0800 (PST), Hank Wirtz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 29, 6:06 pm, "Jay" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Didn't the Giants get the memo?
> >>
> >> They are supposed to just roll over!
> >>
> >> J.
> >
> >Quarter. This is football, not hockey.
>
> Yeah, if it was hockey there'd be legal battery on fellow players
> right on the field. Football players are more civilized - they commit
> crimes only off field where they belong.

Did you see the NE player poke the NY player in the eye?

--
Michael Press

 

[Michael Press]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> [email protected] wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 12:43 pm, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Has he ever NOT worn that ugly thing?
> >
> > Seriously??
> >
> > No wonder they win every game. Dressed like that, he has to. He's
> > like, I don't need no stinkin sleeves. Like weightlifting class from
> > 1983.
>
> I thought it was just an old ratty hooded sweatshirt:
>
> http://www.foulballs.net/2007/09/bill-belichek-will-have-to-wait-on-that.html
>
> Whatever, the guy is dull and classless IMO. Good coach, obviously, but a
> cold grouch...

You never know. I always thought Don Coryell looked like a
miserable ******* on the sidelines. Turns out he was always
a decent guy concentrating on the game at game time.

--
Michael Press

 

[still just me]

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:24:05 GMT, Michael Press <[email protected]>
wrote:

>> >Quarter. This is football, not hockey.
>>
>> Yeah, if it was hockey there'd be legal battery on fellow players
>> right on the field. Football players are more civilized - they commit
>> crimes only off field where they belong.
>
>Did you see the NE player poke the NY player in the eye?

As a matter of fact, I did. They must have ran that six times. But in
hockey that would just be "hello" : -)

 

[Michael Press]

In article
<[email protected]>,
still just me <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:24:05 GMT, Michael Press <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >> >Quarter. This is football, not hockey.
> >>
> >> Yeah, if it was hockey there'd be legal battery on fellow players
> >> right on the field. Football players are more civilized - they commit
> >> crimes only off field where they belong.
> >
> >Did you see the NE player poke the NY player in the eye?
>
> As a matter of fact, I did. They must have ran that six times. But in
> hockey that would just be "hello" : -)

No argument there. Ice hockey is fun to watch with its smoother
rhythm and free swinging attitude.

--
Michael Press

 

[datakoll]

INCROYABLE!
PHYSICAL CONDITIONING!
won all 4.

 

[A Muzi]

datakoll wrote:
> INCROYABLE!
> PHYSICAL CONDITIONING!
> won all 4.

Four? You built two pairs of wheels?

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

 

[Werehatrack]

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:38:46 -0600, A Muzi <[email protected]> may
have said:

>datakoll wrote:
>> INCROYABLE!
>> PHYSICAL CONDITIONING!
>> won all 4.
>
>Four? You built two pairs of wheels?

Beats the heck out of me.



--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.