B
Bomba
Guest
The one thing that has always confused me about the attack on Iraq has been the motive. I've
listened to the ever-changing excuses paraded by the allies, but none of them have been convincing
in my opinion. Oil was a factor, but I couldn't work out why.
Similarly, although I always liked to believe that France and Germany opposed a war for reasons of
justice and not condoning US / UK aggresion, there was always a nagging thought that there was a
vested interest.
These articles propose a theory that makes a lot of sense. I suppose it counts as a conspiracy
theory, but seeing as I'm not convinced of any current theories, alternatives are always an option.
They are well written and the facts hold up to the investigation that I have done.
Whatever your views, it's certainly interesting reading.
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/02/07/arpubwc020703.htm
http://www.feasta.org/documents/papers/oil1.htm
--
a.m-b FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/ambfaq.htm
b.bmx FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/bmx_faq.htm
listened to the ever-changing excuses paraded by the allies, but none of them have been convincing
in my opinion. Oil was a factor, but I couldn't work out why.
Similarly, although I always liked to believe that France and Germany opposed a war for reasons of
justice and not condoning US / UK aggresion, there was always a nagging thought that there was a
vested interest.
These articles propose a theory that makes a lot of sense. I suppose it counts as a conspiracy
theory, but seeing as I'm not convinced of any current theories, alternatives are always an option.
They are well written and the facts hold up to the investigation that I have done.
Whatever your views, it's certainly interesting reading.
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/02/07/arpubwc020703.htm
http://www.feasta.org/documents/papers/oil1.htm
--
a.m-b FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/ambfaq.htm
b.bmx FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/bmx_faq.htm