UK and Europe · Public discussion

OT: Postage stamp validity?

Started by Pete Biggs · · Last activity · 3 posts · 276 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
4 February 2006
Last activity
5 February 2006
Original author
Pete Biggs
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
276
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Selotape covered the stamps, rendering them invalid, as the postmark
    could not reach the stamps", said the bloke in the sorting office, the
    recipient of a parcel I sent has told me. He claims to have been charged
    for the full postage + £1 handling.

    Is the Royal Mail entitled to do this? Was I in the wrong for taping the
    stamps? (Ironically to prevent them falling off and a charge being
    incurred).

    Thanks
    ~PB

  2. Pete Biggs said:

    "Selotape covered the stamps, rendering them invalid, as the postmark
    could not reach the stamps", said the bloke in the sorting office, the
    recipient of a parcel I sent has told me. He claims to have been charged
    for the full postage + £1 handling.

    Is the Royal Mail entitled to do this? Was I in the wrong for taping the
    stamps? (Ironically to prevent them falling off and a charge being
    incurred).

    Thanks
    ~PB

    Yes, I think Royal Mail probably is entitled to do this. The ink they use
    to obliterate stamps won't adhere to Sellotape and they'd be afraid of
    someone removing the stamps and sticking them on something else. I can't
    see why they couldn't have obliterated them in some other way, though.

    They're probably interpreting the Successor Postal Services Company Inland
    Letter Post Scheme 2001 which says in para. 10.4 that "a postage stamp ...
    may not be used ... if it is damaged or imperfect, or if it has been
    defaced, or if it has anything written or printed over it."
    --
    Michael MacClancy

  3. Pete Biggs said:

    "Selotape covered the stamps, rendering them invalid, as the postmark
    could not reach the stamps", said the bloke in the sorting office, the
    recipient of a parcel I sent has told me. He claims to have been charged
    for the full postage + £1 handling.

    Is the Royal Mail entitled to do this? Was I in the wrong for taping the
    stamps? (Ironically to prevent them falling off and a charge being
    incurred).

    Yes. There was a scam running a few years ago (probably still is in
    some places) where high value stamps were coated with gum on the face
    side so that the cancelling ink could be washed off.

    If you want to secure the stamps to stop them falling off stick them
    to a piece of paper and tape that on or use two bits of tape making
    sure you leave a decent amount of the stamp's face exposed.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.