OT Totally but might be interesting here. ::POLITICS::

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
wrote:

> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:39711c67-04fa-4615-afef-4441f7d7b057@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out if the people who think
> > this is Big Brother encroachment also think that
> > brownouts and rolling blackouts are Big Brother
> > encroachment. That is, the utility already has
> > the ability to cut your power and leave you in
> > the dark if it can't supply enough juice. So if
> > it reaches into your house and adjusts the AC
> > instead, is that worse?
>
> And I'm trying to understand what a stupid ass such as yourself understands
> about any of this. After all, the REASON we're having brown-outs and
> black-outs is because of socialist controls of the price of energy and NOT
> allowing power plants to be placed where needed. Priced correctly there
> would be more than enough energy and never would there be a brown-out.

Huh, the last round of brown- and black-outs in California were because of the
power companies playing games to jack the price up, and there are tapes of the
traders doing so (and talking about it at the same time). Are you trying to say that
Enron was a socialist company?

--
tanx,
Howard

Now it's raining pitchforks and women,
But I've already got a pitchfork...

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>,
Fred Fredburger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Howard Kveck wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, "Tom Kunich"<cyclintom@yahoo. com>

> > By the way, I suppose it's silly of me to reply to a cowardly cretin
> > like you who seemingly has killfiled me. But you will reply after reading my posts
> > as others respond to them. I guess you got tired of me proving you wrong again and
> > again.
> >
> .

Oh well, nice try...

--
tanx,
Howard

Now it's raining pitchforks and women,
But I've already got a pitchfork...

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?