Pain's gone



TBR wrote:
> >He said:Actually, I'll probably wind up
> >with a nice fourteen year-old myself. It's not exactly an ambition of
> >mine...more like a premonition -- it just feels like something's
> >that's
> >going to happen "naturally."
> >====
>
> Notice he didn't specify which sex he would end up with?


Notice you had to wonder?
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> You seem to be in "premadonna" mode.
> Good?


Not eve close. For starters, it's two words, spelled "prima donna."
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> You seem to be in "premadonna" mode.
> Good?


Not even close. For starters, it's two words, spelled "prima donna."
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> He said:Actually, I'll probably wind up
> with a nice fourteen year-old myself. It's not exactly an ambition of
> mine...more like a premonition -- it just feels like something's
> that's
> going to happen "naturally."
> ====
>
> That's one sicko mutterfuker.



Actually, I could've done two mothers, too, along with the daughters.
One of them, I could've had two of the three daughters (the third
hadn't developed yet).

But they just weren't right for me.

Not that I'm apologizing for my tastes. They'll be having sex anyway,
so why not with a gent like me who could actually love the girl?

Females of all ages love me. I've been with sexy fifty-somethings to
minors. But precisely because I understand how precious a young girl
is, I've never done anything more with them than kissing and some mild
petting because I knew the girl wasn't for me (the younger they are the
easier it is to read them, for obvious reasons).

Just last week I (34) had a 21 year-old call me up for a date, after
playing coy for two months; I easily turned her down, too, 'cause I
have my standards (too busy for games with girls who need an ego-boost
to be seen around with me) -- so far, I've yet to find one with a brain
barely more functional than...yours, come to think of it. They have
really gorgeous bodies, but I couldn't face myself if I just used them
like any guy their age, since I'm supposed to be different, after all
-- my "comparative advantage," as macroeconomists would say.

Besides, latinas are very easy, despite the *****-shield. No glory
there, really.
 
NYC XYZ <[email protected]> wrote:

re premadonna

>Not eve

Which eve? Christmas? New Year's? That singer/actress
<http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1073992/>? Other?

>close. For starters, it's two words, spelled "prima donna."

And to continue, I suspect you meant the word even. Kinda a bite in
the ass, that. :eek:)

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
 
What can I say -- googlegroups is still in beta mode, after all these
years. Firefox isn't all that, either.


Curt James wrote:
>
>
> And to continue, I suspect you meant the word even. Kinda a bite in
> the ass, that. :eek:)
>
> --
> Curt
> http://curtjames.com/
 
NYC XYZ <[email protected]> wrote:

>What can I say -- googlegroups is still in beta mode, after all these
>years. Firefox isn't all that, either.

I like Google groups, but have been using Free Agent to post recently.
Firefox is on my desktop, but I normally use Internet Explorer to surf
the Web. (My crappy hand-me-down Compaq Presario isn't all that.)

<g>

Hnh.

Lookitdat. An MFW patron withOUT a chip on their shoulder.
Who'dathunkit!?! Alas, you're certainly headed to the so-called troll
enabler list due to this /unfortunate/ personality trait.

Regardless, a belated Happy New Year to you and yours!

DEAR, *JAY EM WHAT-A-JERK*! MORE REVISIONS ON THE WAY! AND COULDYA
SWITCH ALL THAT TO ARIAL? THANKS BUNCHES!!!

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
 
On 15 Jan 2006 07:40:38 -0800, "NYC XYZ" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>> Notice he didn't specify which sex he would end up with?
>
>
>Notice you had to wonder?

Not all, I'm quite sure I know.
 
On 15 Jan 2006 07:42:31 -0800, "NYC XYZ" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>TBR wrote:
>>
>>
>> You seem to be in "premadonna" mode.
>> Good?
>
>
>Not eve close. For starters, it's two words, spelled "prima donna."

You're a *****.
Ok?
 
On 15 Jan 2006 07:58:02 -0800, "NYC XYZ" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>But they just weren't right for me.
>

Being female throws you off...


>Not that I'm apologizing for my tastes. They'll be having sex anyway,
>so why not with a gent like me who could actually love the girl?
>
>Females of all ages love me.

Chics dig gay men.
 
"NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Just last week I (34) had a 21 year-old call me up for a date, after
>playing coy for two months; I easily turned her down, too, 'cause I
>have my standards (too busy for games with girls who need an ego-boost
>to be seen around with me) -- so far, I've yet to find one with a brain
>barely more functional than...yours, come to think of it. They have
>really gorgeous bodies, but I couldn't face myself if I just used them
>like any guy their age, since I'm supposed to be different, after all
>-- my "comparative advantage," as macroeconomists would say.
>
>Besides, latinas are very easy, despite the *****-shield. No glory
>there, really.

********. You are obsessed with the idea of sex with pubescent
Latinas. Here's the comment I brought to your attention in APZ:

"See, if I had the opportunity, I'd go for, what, a fourteen year-old
-- these latinas here blossom at age nine or ten, actually -- 'cause
that's when they hook up with someone who's gonna leave them within
ten years (believe me, I know -- or did you miss my complaints about
the single moms??), and I'm a good guy who'd settle down, give 'em
just what they want, see, and at that age they're not gonna get all
snooty-tooty on me and insist to be respected for their non-existent
brains (of course, it'd be great if she were a prodigy)...but it's
true, they're usually even more annoying and dizzy than a
twenty-something...sigh...."
-- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Feb 2005
(http://tinyurl.com/7hzqf)

And here's your comment I just posted in MFW:

"Actually, I'll probably wind up with a nice fourteen year-old myself.
It's not exactly an ambition of mine...more like a premonition -- it
just feels like something's that's going to happen 'naturally.'"
-- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Dec 2005
(http://tinyurl.com/bq5ho)

And here's your own comment from MFW just a few days ago:

"I don't apologize for my hands wandering over some big-assed twelve
year-old latinita in a g-string."
-- NYC XYZ, misc.fitness.weights, 10 Jan 2006
(http://tinyurl.com/dqz7j)

I note that the target age decreased for that last one. You have some
pedophilic fascinations that really should be handled by a
professional therapist.
 
JMW wrote:
> "NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Just last week I (34) had a 21 year-old call me up for a date, after
>>playing coy for two months; I easily turned her down, too, 'cause I
>>have my standards (too busy for games with girls who need an ego-boost
>>to be seen around with me) -- so far, I've yet to find one with a brain
>>barely more functional than...yours, come to think of it. They have
>>really gorgeous bodies, but I couldn't face myself if I just used them
>>like any guy their age, since I'm supposed to be different, after all
>>-- my "comparative advantage," as macroeconomists would say.
>>
>>Besides, latinas are very easy, despite the *****-shield. No glory
>>there, really.
>
>
> ********. You are obsessed with the idea of sex with pubescent
> Latinas. Here's the comment I brought to your attention in APZ:
>
> "See, if I had the opportunity, I'd go for, what, a fourteen year-old
> -- these latinas here blossom at age nine or ten, actually -- 'cause
> that's when they hook up with someone who's gonna leave them within
> ten years (believe me, I know -- or did you miss my complaints about
> the single moms??), and I'm a good guy who'd settle down, give 'em
> just what they want, see, and at that age they're not gonna get all
> snooty-tooty on me and insist to be respected for their non-existent
> brains (of course, it'd be great if she were a prodigy)...but it's
> true, they're usually even more annoying and dizzy than a
> twenty-something...sigh...."
> -- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Feb 2005
> (http://tinyurl.com/7hzqf)
>
> And here's your comment I just posted in MFW:
>
> "Actually, I'll probably wind up with a nice fourteen year-old myself.
> It's not exactly an ambition of mine...more like a premonition -- it
> just feels like something's that's going to happen 'naturally.'"
> -- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Dec 2005
> (http://tinyurl.com/bq5ho)
>
> And here's your own comment from MFW just a few days ago:
>
> "I don't apologize for my hands wandering over some big-assed twelve
> year-old latinita in a g-string."
> -- NYC XYZ, misc.fitness.weights, 10 Jan 2006
> (http://tinyurl.com/dqz7j)
>
> I note that the target age decreased for that last one. You have some
> pedophilic fascinations that really should be handled by a
> professional therapist.

Actually, I think his issues should be handled by the FBI and their
staff assigned to deal with Internet child predators. At the very least,
his computer will be seized and he'll no longer have access (for a time
at least) to chat rooms frequented by children.

--
spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/
 
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:01:44 +0800, spodosaurus
<spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote:

>Actually, I think his issues should be handled by the FBI and their
>staff assigned to deal with Internet child predators. At the very least,
>his computer will be seized and he'll no longer have access (for a time
>at least) to chat rooms frequented by children.

I gotta agree. This guy has major issues, both mental and legal. Lets
hope the wannabe lawyer turns him in.
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> Not all, I'm quite sure I know.


So why you ask?

If MFW is getting boring for you, try hittin' the gym.
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> You're a *****.
> Ok?


Oh come on, be more orignal, or use google to find something to make us
laugh.
 
spodosaurus <spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote:
>JMW wrote:
>> "NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Just last week I (34) had a 21 year-old call me up for a date, after
>>>playing coy for two months; I easily turned her down, too, 'cause I
>>>have my standards (too busy for games with girls who need an ego-boost
>>>to be seen around with me) -- so far, I've yet to find one with a brain
>>>barely more functional than...yours, come to think of it. They have
>>>really gorgeous bodies, but I couldn't face myself if I just used them
>>>like any guy their age, since I'm supposed to be different, after all
>>>-- my "comparative advantage," as macroeconomists would say.
>>>
>>>Besides, latinas are very easy, despite the *****-shield. No glory
>>>there, really.
>>
>>
>> ********. You are obsessed with the idea of sex with pubescent
>> Latinas. Here's the comment I brought to your attention in APZ:
>>
>> "See, if I had the opportunity, I'd go for, what, a fourteen year-old
>> -- these latinas here blossom at age nine or ten, actually -- 'cause
>> that's when they hook up with someone who's gonna leave them within
>> ten years (believe me, I know -- or did you miss my complaints about
>> the single moms??), and I'm a good guy who'd settle down, give 'em
>> just what they want, see, and at that age they're not gonna get all
>> snooty-tooty on me and insist to be respected for their non-existent
>> brains (of course, it'd be great if she were a prodigy)...but it's
>> true, they're usually even more annoying and dizzy than a
>> twenty-something...sigh...."
>> -- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Feb 2005
>> (http://tinyurl.com/7hzqf)
>>
>> And here's your comment I just posted in MFW:
>>
>> "Actually, I'll probably wind up with a nice fourteen year-old myself.
>> It's not exactly an ambition of mine...more like a premonition -- it
>> just feels like something's that's going to happen 'naturally.'"
>> -- NYC XYZ, alt.support.loneliness, 28 Dec 2005
>> (http://tinyurl.com/bq5ho)
>>
>> And here's your own comment from MFW just a few days ago:
>>
>> "I don't apologize for my hands wandering over some big-assed twelve
>> year-old latinita in a g-string."
>> -- NYC XYZ, misc.fitness.weights, 10 Jan 2006
>> (http://tinyurl.com/dqz7j)
>>
>> I note that the target age decreased for that last one. You have some
>> pedophilic fascinations that really should be handled by a
>> professional therapist.
>
>Actually, I think his issues should be handled by the FBI and their
>staff assigned to deal with Internet child predators. At the very least,
>his computer will be seized and he'll no longer have access (for a time
>at least) to chat rooms frequented by children.

Actually, that's handled mostly by local law enforcement. Here's an
interesting one:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5497-2005Mar27?language=printer
 
spodosaurus wrote:
>
>
> Actually, I think his issues should be handled by the FBI and their
> staff assigned to deal with Internet child predators. At the very least,
> his computer will be seized and he'll no longer have access (for a time
> at least) to chat rooms frequented by children.

My you have an overactive imagination.

Or is that your personal experience?

Better stop using that funny white protein shake!

> --
> spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply
>
> I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
> neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
> hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
> marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
> transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
> http://www.abmdr.org.au/
> http://www.marrow.org/
 
Curt James wrote:
>
>
> I like Google groups,

Dejanews was much better -- just simpler, more intuitive. I feel like
I'm actually using software with googlegroups sometimes, if you know
what I mean.

> but have been using Free Agent to post recently.

I hear good things about it, but I just couldn't figure it out last
time I tried.

> Firefox is on my desktop, but I normally use Internet Explorer to surf
> the Web. (My crappy hand-me-down Compaq Presario isn't all that.)

Opposite situation for me: some sites are Mozilla-unfriendly...though,
like I said, Firefox ain't all that for my quotidian purposes of
trolling for morons.

> <g>
>
> Hnh.
>
> Lookitdat. An MFW patron withOUT a chip on their shoulder.
> Who'dathunkit!?! Alas, you're certainly headed to the so-called troll
> enabler list due to this /unfortunate/ personality trait.

This is a funny NG: most of the posters don't sound like guys who
actually work out. They remind me of vegans who smoke cigarettes.

> Regardless, a belated Happy New Year to you and yours!
>
> DEAR, *JAY EM WHAT-A-JERK*! MORE REVISIONS ON THE WAY! AND COULDYA
> SWITCH ALL THAT TO ARIAL? THANKS BUNCHES!!!
>
> --
> Curt
> http://curtjames.com/
 
TBR wrote:
>
>
> Being female throws you off...

You need high school sex ed.

> Chics dig gay men.

Well, that explains it, then, you *** hag.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back