Papai sure is upset.

[crit pro]

Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
human beings.

Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
lune.

Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO

 

[Sierraman]

"crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> human beings.
>
> Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> lune.
>
> Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO

Oh boy, you don't have a clue. Let me help you before you self destruct. It
could very well be that you are incorrigible but there is still hope. Just
because you are a pro doesn't mean you are automagically respected upon
entering this newsgroup, you have to earn it first. If you want your views
to receive honest respectful replies then you must follow the rbr yellow
brick road. First you enter the gauntlet, and take some licks which you
have. Next you must let rbr tweak you and mold you over time. It's for your
own good. There is a hierarchy here, and I'm afraid you are at the bottom of
the totem pole for now. All is not lost, since you seem to want to enter the
fold. It might take a while, but you will figure out who is in charge here.
In time you could be accepted and then your views will at least be
tolerated, but not respected. That takes time. So chill out a bit, 10 posts
in a row will do little to show your determination to hijack rbr. I suggest
taking a break since the frustration is building against you. Come back in a
few days and don't resist, submit to us, and rbr will carefully tweak you
over time. Like a fine wine, it's possible you can grow to be accepted. Post
sparingly, post something thoughtful and interesting, try not to be
antagonistic, belligerent, or obnoxious, and give it some time, because the
way you are going, your are headed to self destruct. Chill on language
against others, not as bad when it's about something funny, but don't be a
gutter mouth.



Those are your lessons in life for today.



Ok Dad, yes son.



B-

 

[alex]

Nice little "cosa nostra" speech. But I do not see why Pro Crit has to
pass any "membership" exam from the self-appointed guardians of the group.
Does participation in this group give any bragging rights in the US or
something?

Where is Ronde Champ when we need him?

"Sierraman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> > enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> > human beings.
> >
> > Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> > lune.
> >
> > Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO
>
> Oh boy, you don't have a clue. Let me help you before you self destruct.
It
> could very well be that you are incorrigible but there is still hope. Just
> because you are a pro doesn't mean you are automagically respected upon
> entering this newsgroup, you have to earn it first. If you want your views
> to receive honest respectful replies then you must follow the rbr yellow
> brick road. First you enter the gauntlet, and take some licks which you
> have. Next you must let rbr tweak you and mold you over time. It's for
your
> own good. There is a hierarchy here, and I'm afraid you are at the bottom
of
> the totem pole for now. All is not lost, since you seem to want to enter
the
> fold. It might take a while, but you will figure out who is in charge
here.
> In time you could be accepted and then your views will at least be
> tolerated, but not respected. That takes time. So chill out a bit, 10
posts
> in a row will do little to show your determination to hijack rbr. I
suggest
> taking a break since the frustration is building against you. Come back in
a
> few days and don't resist, submit to us, and rbr will carefully tweak you
> over time. Like a fine wine, it's possible you can grow to be accepted.
Post
> sparingly, post something thoughtful and interesting, try not to be
> antagonistic, belligerent, or obnoxious, and give it some time, because
the
> way you are going, your are headed to self destruct. Chill on language
> against others, not as bad when it's about something funny, but don't be a
> gutter mouth.
>
>
>
> Those are your lessons in life for today.
>
>
>
> Ok Dad, yes son.
>
>
>
> B-
>
>

 

[Sierraman]

"alex" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Nice little "cosa nostra" speech. But I do not see why Pro Crit has to
> pass any "membership" exam from the self-appointed guardians of the group.
> Does participation in this group give any bragging rights in the US or
> something?

no, several of the RBR Gods are from Europe.

One more clue for critter pro, the Gods of RBR are angry with you. It
wouldn't do any good to tell you who they are because you don't know them
and wouldn't repect them. In time you will both know them and respect them
if you last. Give it some time, just think of yourself as a puppy, in time,
probably a very long time you could become one of the big dogs, but it won't
happen overnight, not next month, and I doubt next year. Patience young man.
Rome wasn't built in a day.

>
> Where is Ronde Champ when we need him?
>
> "Sierraman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> > > enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> > > human beings.
> > >
> > > Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> > > lune.
> > >
> > > Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO
> >
> > Oh boy, you don't have a clue. Let me help you before you self destruct.
> It
> > could very well be that you are incorrigible but there is still hope.
Just
> > because you are a pro doesn't mean you are automagically respected upon
> > entering this newsgroup, you have to earn it first. If you want your
views
> > to receive honest respectful replies then you must follow the rbr yellow
> > brick road. First you enter the gauntlet, and take some licks which you
> > have. Next you must let rbr tweak you and mold you over time. It's for
> your
> > own good. There is a hierarchy here, and I'm afraid you are at the
bottom
> of
> > the totem pole for now. All is not lost, since you seem to want to enter
> the
> > fold. It might take a while, but you will figure out who is in charge
> here.
> > In time you could be accepted and then your views will at least be
> > tolerated, but not respected. That takes time. So chill out a bit, 10
> posts
> > in a row will do little to show your determination to hijack rbr. I
> suggest
> > taking a break since the frustration is building against you. Come back
in
> a
> > few days and don't resist, submit to us, and rbr will carefully tweak
you
> > over time. Like a fine wine, it's possible you can grow to be accepted.
> Post
> > sparingly, post something thoughtful and interesting, try not to be
> > antagonistic, belligerent, or obnoxious, and give it some time, because
> the
> > way you are going, your are headed to self destruct. Chill on language
> > against others, not as bad when it's about something funny, but don't be
a
> > gutter mouth.
> >
> >
> >
> > Those are your lessons in life for today.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok Dad, yes son.
> >
> >
> >
> > B-
> >
> >
>
>

 

[Chris]

"crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> human beings.
>
> Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> lune.

So you notice that in others, but not in the guy looking back at you from
the mirror?

>
> Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO

Knowing Ken makes you want to "stay forever"? Great, stalkers going after
each other. Maybe you guys can start your own NG?

 

[Chris]

"Sierraman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> > enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> > human beings.
> >
> > Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> > lune.
> >
> > Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO
>
> Oh boy, you don't have a clue. Let me help you before you self destruct.
It
> could very well be that you are incorrigible but there is still hope.

Optimism like that is rare these days.

> Just
> because you are a pro doesn't mean you are automagically respected upon
> entering this newsgroup,

That is why I do not beleive he is a "pro" anything. Any professional of any
kind would know how much respect that profession would naturally bring to
them.

you have to earn it first. If you want your views
> to receive honest respectful replies then you must follow the rbr yellow
> brick road. First you enter the gauntlet, and take some licks which you
> have. Next you must let rbr tweak you and mold you over time. It's for
your
> own good. There is a hierarchy here, and I'm afraid you are at the bottom
of
> the totem pole for now. All is not lost, since you seem to want to enter
the
> fold. It might take a while, but you will figure out who is in charge
here.
> In time you could be accepted and then your views will at least be
> tolerated, but not respected. That takes time. So chill out a bit, 10
posts
> in a row will do little to show your determination to hijack rbr. I
suggest
> taking a break since the frustration is building against you. Come back in
a
> few days and don't resist, submit to us, and rbr will carefully tweak you
> over time. Like a fine wine, it's possible you can grow to be accepted.
Post
> sparingly, post something thoughtful and interesting, try not to be
> antagonistic, belligerent, or obnoxious, and give it some time, because
the
> way you are going, your are headed to self destruct. Chill on language
> against others, not as bad when it's about something funny, but don't be a
> gutter mouth.
>
>
>
> Those are your lessons in life for today.
>
>
>
> Ok Dad, yes son.
>
>
>
> B-
>
>

 

[Chris]

"alex" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Nice little "cosa nostra" speech. But I do not see why Pro Crit has to
> pass any "membership" exam from the self-appointed guardians of the group.
> Does participation in this group give any bragging rights in the US or
> something?

I did not take it quite that way (but just skimmed it). I think he was
giving NG advice in general. Otherwise, I agree with you.

>
> Where is Ronde Champ when we need him?
>
> "Sierraman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> > > enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> > > human beings.
> > >
> > > Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> > > lune.
> > >
> > > Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO
> >
> > Oh boy, you don't have a clue. Let me help you before you self destruct.
> It
> > could very well be that you are incorrigible but there is still hope.
Just
> > because you are a pro doesn't mean you are automagically respected upon
> > entering this newsgroup, you have to earn it first. If you want your
views
> > to receive honest respectful replies then you must follow the rbr yellow
> > brick road. First you enter the gauntlet, and take some licks which you
> > have. Next you must let rbr tweak you and mold you over time. It's for
> your
> > own good. There is a hierarchy here, and I'm afraid you are at the
bottom
> of
> > the totem pole for now. All is not lost, since you seem to want to enter
> the
> > fold. It might take a while, but you will figure out who is in charge
> here.
> > In time you could be accepted and then your views will at least be
> > tolerated, but not respected. That takes time. So chill out a bit, 10
> posts
> > in a row will do little to show your determination to hijack rbr. I
> suggest
> > taking a break since the frustration is building against you. Come back
in
> a
> > few days and don't resist, submit to us, and rbr will carefully tweak
you
> > over time. Like a fine wine, it's possible you can grow to be accepted.
> Post
> > sparingly, post something thoughtful and interesting, try not to be
> > antagonistic, belligerent, or obnoxious, and give it some time, because
> the
> > way you are going, your are headed to self destruct. Chill on language
> > against others, not as bad when it's about something funny, but don't be
a
> > gutter mouth.
> >
> >
> >
> > Those are your lessons in life for today.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok Dad, yes son.
> >
> >
> >
> > B-
> >
> >
>
>

 

[Ken Papai]

"crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> human beings.

Why should I have any compassion for someone so ill as you?
Maybe if you admit a mental illness I'll feel your pain, otherwise, like any
infected saddle sore, I have no compassion for someone as disturbed as you.
You make our lives here worse and do absolutely noting to improve the lot at
RBR.

Adios 5th grade wiz kid/gal who hides in anonymity because you know the fool
you are.

-Ken (my real name, what is yours?)
>
> Ken Papai also believes that RBR is his own personal newsgroup. What a
> lune.
>
> Note to Ken: I know who you are. I am not going away. GFYS. -crit PRO

 

[Sierraman]

"Ken Papai" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:lRH_c.124353$Fg5.12847@attbi_s53...
>
> "crit pro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Ken Papai supports DOPERS. Anybody who questions Ken Papai is his
> > enemy. He gets mad quite easily. He does not have compasion for fellow
> > human beings.
>
> Why should I have any compassion for someone so ill as you?
> Maybe if you admit a mental illness I'll feel your pain, otherwise, like
any
> infected saddle sore, I have no compassion for someone as disturbed as
you.
> You make our lives here worse and do absolutely noting to improve the lot
at
> RBR.
>
> Adios 5th grade wiz kid/gal who hides in anonymity because you know the
fool
> you are.

You said that before. If the person in question is in fact a dizzying broad,
then that might account for some of the recent lunatic posts that border on
the mentally insane. I have friends who work in corrections down in
Chowchilla women's prison there and they said that the women can be much
more over the top then men. They can pull stuff that just breaks the scale
when compared to the men. I understand that men have more civility in
prisons then women, when it comes to just how low one can stoop, talking
about the lowest possible elements. Maybe this is true in real life too, but
I haven't read any studies on this. If Critter Pro is a (she), then maybe
that could account for that, but it's certainly a current problem when 20
out of the last 30 posts are critter pro. It's not fair to the rest of rbr
when they see their favorite posts scroll off the back. Many have ISP's and
news readers that only serve them well in the first 20 or 30 posts, then it
became a broken index for many, giving up at that point. Obviously Critter
Pro doesn't care and thinks it's a big game. Of course we know if you
completely ignore something it will go away in time. All depends on how much
you feed it, that said, if (reforming) has no effort on the seemingly
incorrigible. My ex-girlfriend has a PHD and majors in Psychology but I
doubt she could help this person. Next thing, critter pro might start acting
like Linda Blair in the Exorcist. Instead of spewing flames and general
discord, maybe something green.



B-

 

[Curtis L. Russell]

On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:09:34 -0700, "Sierraman" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>My ex-girlfriend has a PHD and majors in Psychology but I
>doubt she could help this person.

I think it would require a degree and license that includes the right
to prescribe meds. Or take them away - I haven't figured out which.
The posting rate sort of indicates that they just discovered the
really big cups at the local coffee shop and maybe he/she would calm
down with a few ales. I'm recommending Old Peculiar myself. In fact,
all this thinking has worked up a thirst...

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

 

[Kyle Legate]

"Curtis L. Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> calm
> down with a few ales. I'm recommending Old Peculiar myself. In fact,
> all this thinking has worked up a thirst...
>
Wow, thanks for reminding me of Old Peculiar. I used to live in a town with
an excellent bar serving over 200 brands of beer from all over the world. I
tried an Old Peculiar once and found it quite good. Plus, the place let you
keep the bottle and I NEEDED to have that one.

 

[Papai Digital]

"Kyle Legate" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "Curtis L. Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > calm
> > down with a few ales. I'm recommending Old Peculiar myself. In fact,
> > all this thinking has worked up a thirst...
> >
> Wow, thanks for reminding me of Old Peculiar. I used to live in a town with
> an excellent bar serving over 200 brands of beer from all over the world. I
> tried an Old Peculiar once and found it quite good. Plus, the place let you
> keep the bottle and I NEEDED to have that one.

Theakston's Old Peculier ("...ier")

 

[gwhite]

Sierraman wrote:
>

> You said that before. If the person in question is in fact a dizzying broad,
> then that might account for some of the recent lunatic posts that border on
> the mentally insane. I have friends who work in corrections down in
> Chowchilla women's prison there and they said that the women can be much
> more over the top then men. They can pull stuff that just breaks the scale
> when compared to the men. I understand that men have more civility in
> prisons then women, when it comes to just how low one can stoop, talking
> about the lowest possible elements. Maybe this is true in real life too, but
> I haven't read any studies on this. If Critter Pro is a (she), then maybe
> that could account for that, but it's certainly a current problem when 20
> out of the last 30 posts are critter pro. It's not fair to the rest of rbr
> when they see their favorite posts scroll off the back. Many have ISP's and
> news readers that only serve them well in the first 20 or 30 posts, then it
> became a broken index for many, giving up at that point. Obviously Critter
> Pro doesn't care and thinks it's a big game. Of course we know if you
> completely ignore something it will go away in time. All depends on how much
> you feed it, that said, if (reforming) has no effort on the seemingly
> incorrigible. My ex-girlfriend has a PHD and majors in Psychology but I
> doubt she could help this person. Next thing, critter pro might start acting
> like Linda Blair in the Exorcist. Instead of spewing flames and general
> discord, maybe something green.


Maybe try two returns in a row sometime.