B
Ben
Guest
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:14:13 +0100, Helen Deborah Vecht <[email protected]> wrote:
>Thus spake Tim Hall <[email protected]>
>
>> Ding! again. As part of someone's mono-buttocked (thank you Sheldon) idea of improving things,
>> some pavements (sidewalks) have been declared dual use by adding a blue sign showing a
>> peddestrian and a bike next to each other.
>
>Sometimes they also use coloured tarmac for the cyclists. The colour fades in time and the
>distinction is seldom observed by pedestrians, which tends to tempt cyclists onto the
>'pedestrian' parts.
I don't think I've ever seen a ped observe the distinction between the cycling and pedestrian parts
of a dual-use pavement.
--
"We take these risks, not to escape from life, but to prevent life escaping from us." ***** replace
'spam' with 'ben' to reply *****
>Thus spake Tim Hall <[email protected]>
>
>> Ding! again. As part of someone's mono-buttocked (thank you Sheldon) idea of improving things,
>> some pavements (sidewalks) have been declared dual use by adding a blue sign showing a
>> peddestrian and a bike next to each other.
>
>Sometimes they also use coloured tarmac for the cyclists. The colour fades in time and the
>distinction is seldom observed by pedestrians, which tends to tempt cyclists onto the
>'pedestrian' parts.
I don't think I've ever seen a ped observe the distinction between the cycling and pedestrian parts
of a dual-use pavement.
--
"We take these risks, not to escape from life, but to prevent life escaping from us." ***** replace
'spam' with 'ben' to reply *****