It is getting about that time that I need to start thinking about when, if, and how I am going to peak. I just want to be sure I have a full understanding of the concept and am approaching it the best way possible. Without a power meter I have been doing my best to track my training using a spread sheet that takes into account training volume and intensity to come up with a rudimentary way for me to track my training. My training has been fairly balanced L1 through L4, with less time spent L5+ (I do L5+ intervals maybe once or twice a week). I am up to 11 hours a week mostly indoor training. The weather is starting to break so my plan was to spend much more time outdoors, so my training volume will increase. Aside from riding outside, I plan to do more L5+ intervals indoors. The maximum amount of time I will have to consistently devote towards training will be 18hrs per week.
My understanding of peaking is that say the spreadsheet I have created to try to give me a generic CTL says 100 (it does not really say 100 I am just picking an easy number) and I want to have "slow long peak", I can slowly taper my training each week to have a longer peak. So week 1 I use 90 towards training, I have an extra 10 towards my performance, week 2 I use 80 and I would maybe have an extra 15, week 3 I use 70 towards training, but may be back to 10. The fact that I am tapering my training will reduce my CTL, so at some point I will be back to 0 because my CLT and use will again match (it will just be lower). At this point I need to start to increase training to head for another peak.
OR I could get a "hard and short peak" I could go from 100 to 50 and have an extra 50, but my time at that peak will be short lived before I need to start rebuilding.
I am going on a cruise at the end of June and have a decent size race the week after we get back, I do not intend to let my training go to **** during the cruise, but will be limited to the spin bikes on the boat. So to me this seems like a natural place to have a "hard and short peak". My issue is that the end of June is a long way off and I am not sure that I can continue to build on my training until then, so I was thinking of trying to have a "slow long peak" at the start of race season. My thought is that if I don't go to deep (i.e. I slowly go from 100 to 70), it will be easy to build back up and take my training beyond where I did my early season peak at and then have a "hard and short peak" at the end of June. From there I could maybe fit one more end of season peak in.
Thanks in advance to reading my rudimentary description of what I THINK peaking is!
My understanding of peaking is that say the spreadsheet I have created to try to give me a generic CTL says 100 (it does not really say 100 I am just picking an easy number) and I want to have "slow long peak", I can slowly taper my training each week to have a longer peak. So week 1 I use 90 towards training, I have an extra 10 towards my performance, week 2 I use 80 and I would maybe have an extra 15, week 3 I use 70 towards training, but may be back to 10. The fact that I am tapering my training will reduce my CTL, so at some point I will be back to 0 because my CLT and use will again match (it will just be lower). At this point I need to start to increase training to head for another peak.
OR I could get a "hard and short peak" I could go from 100 to 50 and have an extra 50, but my time at that peak will be short lived before I need to start rebuilding.
I am going on a cruise at the end of June and have a decent size race the week after we get back, I do not intend to let my training go to **** during the cruise, but will be limited to the spin bikes on the boat. So to me this seems like a natural place to have a "hard and short peak". My issue is that the end of June is a long way off and I am not sure that I can continue to build on my training until then, so I was thinking of trying to have a "slow long peak" at the start of race season. My thought is that if I don't go to deep (i.e. I slowly go from 100 to 70), it will be easy to build back up and take my training beyond where I did my early season peak at and then have a "hard and short peak" at the end of June. From there I could maybe fit one more end of season peak in.
- Am I thinking of the whole "peak concept" correctly?
- Is it unrealistic to shoot for 3 peaks per season?
- Without a powermeter what is the best way to determine when my peak is over?
- When it comes to increasing back up I am assuming it is best to start where you leave off at the end of the peak and work back up from there?
- Should I be counting my racing as training towards all of this?
Thanks in advance to reading my rudimentary description of what I THINK peaking is!