D
David Wright
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
Carole <[email protected]> wrote:
>[email protected] (David Wright) wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> >
>> >And you call yourself a thinking person. Using the same
>> >argument you could say that diabetes have a pancreas and
>> >don't need insulin injections. Or asthmatics have lungs
>> >and don't need puffers.
>> >
>> >Getting back to the argument of pH is it obvious the
>> >conventional mob have been badly let down once more in
>> >yet another area of basic health. But what is new? This
>> >is an ongoing saga with the conventional mob failing to
>> >admit to any natural process within the body.
>>
>> What a silly comment -- as if all processes in the body
>> weren't "natural."
>
>So's thinking, but you don't do it.
That's why I keep reading you, Carole -- you're so
unintentionally hilarious.
>> >From my experience the only most effective method for
>> >improving the pH of the blood is with cellsalts -
>> >primarily sodium phosphate and sulphate, and silica to a
>> >lesser extent.
>>
>> Guess what, Carole? You don't *have* any experience in
>> improving the pH of the blood -- with cell salts or
>> anything else. For one thing,
>
>Yeah, I do. I have my own personal experience Dave.
>And what do you know about it "the lungs and the
>kidneys do it all".
What do YOU know about it? You don't even know what pH *is*.
And since you've never measured your blood pH, you can't
claim to have influenced it. And you haven't influenced it
anyway, since it's kept very stable at 7.4.
>> you haven't tested your blood's pH, and even if you had,
>> you'd have found that it stays in a very tight range no
>> matter what.
>
>I know that. It stays at 7.6.
Then why are you claiming to have influenced it?
>But what do you know about acid attacks or acidosis? I
>would what you have been taught in med school or wherever
>you attended ...zilch.
But you don't know anything about it -- I have no doubt that
"everything you know is wrong." You're not even ignorant,
you're deep into negative territory.
As Will Rogers once said, "It ain't what he don't know
that bothers
me. It's what he knows for sure that ain't so."
>> Even "Dr" Cee admits this.
>
>Getting desperate now Dave. You must be to quote DrC.
I'm sure he deeply respects you also. No, wait, he's the one
who corrected you about the normal blood pH. You couldn't
even get THAT right.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Carole <[email protected]> wrote:
>[email protected] (David Wright) wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> >
>> >And you call yourself a thinking person. Using the same
>> >argument you could say that diabetes have a pancreas and
>> >don't need insulin injections. Or asthmatics have lungs
>> >and don't need puffers.
>> >
>> >Getting back to the argument of pH is it obvious the
>> >conventional mob have been badly let down once more in
>> >yet another area of basic health. But what is new? This
>> >is an ongoing saga with the conventional mob failing to
>> >admit to any natural process within the body.
>>
>> What a silly comment -- as if all processes in the body
>> weren't "natural."
>
>So's thinking, but you don't do it.
That's why I keep reading you, Carole -- you're so
unintentionally hilarious.
>> >From my experience the only most effective method for
>> >improving the pH of the blood is with cellsalts -
>> >primarily sodium phosphate and sulphate, and silica to a
>> >lesser extent.
>>
>> Guess what, Carole? You don't *have* any experience in
>> improving the pH of the blood -- with cell salts or
>> anything else. For one thing,
>
>Yeah, I do. I have my own personal experience Dave.
>And what do you know about it "the lungs and the
>kidneys do it all".
What do YOU know about it? You don't even know what pH *is*.
And since you've never measured your blood pH, you can't
claim to have influenced it. And you haven't influenced it
anyway, since it's kept very stable at 7.4.
>> you haven't tested your blood's pH, and even if you had,
>> you'd have found that it stays in a very tight range no
>> matter what.
>
>I know that. It stays at 7.6.
Then why are you claiming to have influenced it?
>But what do you know about acid attacks or acidosis? I
>would what you have been taught in med school or wherever
>you attended ...zilch.
But you don't know anything about it -- I have no doubt that
"everything you know is wrong." You're not even ignorant,
you're deep into negative territory.
As Will Rogers once said, "It ain't what he don't know
that bothers
me. It's what he knows for sure that ain't so."
>> Even "Dr" Cee admits this.
>
>Getting desperate now Dave. You must be to quote DrC.
I'm sure he deeply respects you also. No, wait, he's the one
who corrected you about the normal blood pH. You couldn't
even get THAT right.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)