O
Ozark Bicycle
Guest
On May 12, 9:54 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article
> <[email protected]>,
> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 9:53 am, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <[email protected]>,
> >> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On May 10, 10:59 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> In article
> >>>> <[email protected]>,
> >>>> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> On May 8, 10:49 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
> >>>>>> "Jay - BFri Commuter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> "rod shaftesbury" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:2007050716344016807-upyours@bungholecom...
> >>>>>>>>I had purchased a planet bike superflash blinkie in November of last year.
> >>>>>>>>I was riding the 5 boro bike tour and the light fell out of it's housing. I
> >>>>>>>>called them this morning to see if this type of thing is covered under
> >>>>>>>>warranty and they were like "Yeah, sure, no problem. We'll send it out
> >>>>>>>>today"...Oh, and a real person answered the phone quickly, i.e. no
> >>>>>>>>IVR/voice tree from hell.
>
> >>>>>>>> So, if you are considering purchasing an accessory and a planet bike
> >>>>>>>> product is an option, you might want to remember PB's great customer
> >>>>>>>> service when deciding which accessory to buy!
>
> >>>>>>>> To me, it is worth extra money for good service...
>
> >>>>>>>> signed, a happy customer, who is appreciative of good service....
>
> >>>>>>>> thanks
>
> >>>>>>> Since it looks like this thread has morphed into 'good customer service
>
> >>>>>> It did not `morph'. This is the original topic. You are responding
> >>>>>> to the first post in the thread.
>
> >>>>> Unclench, Michael.
>
> >>>> Did you see the anomaly? Do you wish to comment on the substance?
> >>>> No. Play to the cheap seats, and you will always have friends.
>
> >>> I don't think that it's playing to the cheap seats to point out that
> >>> probably 1 in 20 of your posts is to "correct" someone within your
> >>> self-made framework of netiquette. The guy was pointing out that the
> >>> OP was about Planet Bike's CS, not CS in general.
>
> >>> But that's right, you don't read subject lines.
>
> >>> Dork.
>
> >> You speak for the original poster?
>
> > I speak to the exact text of the original post's subject line, "planet
> > bike's awesome customer service."
>
> > But as you've pointed out before, you don't read subject lines.
>
> Read Jay's words again. "Since it looks like this
> thread has morphed into 'good customer service
> experiences', I need to praise Bike Friday."
>
> Observe the use of the past tense, and that he replies
> to the original poster. In fact the thread had not
> (meta)morph(osed), contrary to what you say.
>
> Also note that I did not bring in etiquette either
> implictly or explicitly. Implying that I did is
> misleading.
>
> Playng to the cheap seats is in your tone and style of
> discourse. Your initial post is an injunction. We have
> not contract where I allow you to issue injunctions to
> me. Use of coarse language is an explicit part of your
> style, in this case an attempt (successful) to call
> down derision.
>
"Unclench" is coarse language?? It might have referred to your jaw,
not your a**, you know.
> In article
> <[email protected]>,
> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 9:53 am, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <[email protected]>,
> >> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On May 10, 10:59 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> In article
> >>>> <[email protected]>,
> >>>> Hank Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> On May 8, 10:49 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
> >>>>>> "Jay - BFri Commuter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> "rod shaftesbury" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:2007050716344016807-upyours@bungholecom...
> >>>>>>>>I had purchased a planet bike superflash blinkie in November of last year.
> >>>>>>>>I was riding the 5 boro bike tour and the light fell out of it's housing. I
> >>>>>>>>called them this morning to see if this type of thing is covered under
> >>>>>>>>warranty and they were like "Yeah, sure, no problem. We'll send it out
> >>>>>>>>today"...Oh, and a real person answered the phone quickly, i.e. no
> >>>>>>>>IVR/voice tree from hell.
>
> >>>>>>>> So, if you are considering purchasing an accessory and a planet bike
> >>>>>>>> product is an option, you might want to remember PB's great customer
> >>>>>>>> service when deciding which accessory to buy!
>
> >>>>>>>> To me, it is worth extra money for good service...
>
> >>>>>>>> signed, a happy customer, who is appreciative of good service....
>
> >>>>>>>> thanks
>
> >>>>>>> Since it looks like this thread has morphed into 'good customer service
>
> >>>>>> It did not `morph'. This is the original topic. You are responding
> >>>>>> to the first post in the thread.
>
> >>>>> Unclench, Michael.
>
> >>>> Did you see the anomaly? Do you wish to comment on the substance?
> >>>> No. Play to the cheap seats, and you will always have friends.
>
> >>> I don't think that it's playing to the cheap seats to point out that
> >>> probably 1 in 20 of your posts is to "correct" someone within your
> >>> self-made framework of netiquette. The guy was pointing out that the
> >>> OP was about Planet Bike's CS, not CS in general.
>
> >>> But that's right, you don't read subject lines.
>
> >>> Dork.
>
> >> You speak for the original poster?
>
> > I speak to the exact text of the original post's subject line, "planet
> > bike's awesome customer service."
>
> > But as you've pointed out before, you don't read subject lines.
>
> Read Jay's words again. "Since it looks like this
> thread has morphed into 'good customer service
> experiences', I need to praise Bike Friday."
>
> Observe the use of the past tense, and that he replies
> to the original poster. In fact the thread had not
> (meta)morph(osed), contrary to what you say.
>
> Also note that I did not bring in etiquette either
> implictly or explicitly. Implying that I did is
> misleading.
>
> Playng to the cheap seats is in your tone and style of
> discourse. Your initial post is an injunction. We have
> not contract where I allow you to issue injunctions to
> me. Use of coarse language is an explicit part of your
> style, in this case an attempt (successful) to call
> down derision.
>
"Unclench" is coarse language?? It might have referred to your jaw,
not your a**, you know.
