"Robert Chung" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Andy Coggan" <
[email protected]> wrote
> > (BTW, note that there may be reasons to question the accuracy of the SRM Amateur crank used in
> > that comparison.)
>
> Have you heard anything specific, or is this an allusion to what we've already discussed?
It is pure speculation, based upon:
1) the approximate age of the SRM crank in question;
2) the fact that Adam hasn't calibrated it;
3) the fact that it is an Amateur model; and
4) the fact that at some time points the SRM and PowerTap agreed very closely, but at other times
they didn't. Whether that is due to power losses in the drive train, errors in the SRM data due
to off-axis torques, or merely reflects random error, I don't know (although the answer might be
in the data), but I find it bothersome.
In any case, my point is merely that a single three-way comparison is hardly proof of anything, yet
people often cite this example as the final word on the subject.
Andy Coggan