Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Polar's Altimeter vs Google Earth's Elevations

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 443 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 July 2006
Last activity
29 July 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
443
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Which do you think is more accurate
    (for relative elevations only) ?

    http://www.polarusa.com/Products/consumer/s720.asp

    http://earth.google.com

  2. Quoted message said:


    Which do you think is more accurate
    (for relative elevations only) ?

    http://www.polarusa.com/Products/consumer/s720.asp

    http://earth.google.com

    Google; their data is derived from radar altimetry, while the Polar
    S720 uses a barometer.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  3. Kinky Cowboy <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Google; their data is derived from radar altimetry, while the Polar
    S720 uses a barometer.

    I disagree. Most map-based altitudes are averaged over an area and if
    you are biking on a road in a hilly area, the road is generally lower (on
    average) than the surrounding hills. Over short distances, I think a
    properly calibrated barometric altimeter is more accurate.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.