Cycling Training · Public discussion

Polarised vs Threshold Training Distribution

Started by ambal · · Last activity · 1 post · 15 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
16 September 2026
Last activity
16 September 2026
Original author
ambal
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
15
Views / 30 days
14

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There are two primary schools of thought on intensity distribution. One keeps the vast majority of riding very easy and concentrates the hard work into specific sessions, while another spends more time living near threshold.

    Choosing between them usually comes down to time and the type of fatigue a rider can handle. The polarised approach fits those who need to maximize a limited window by making the hard days truly hard. Conversely, threshold work can be more sustainable for those with more hours who can absorb a steady, moderate load without burning out before the weekend.

    Does your current time availability dictate which intensity distribution you use, or do you choose based on the specific demands of your goal events?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.