Popular Science article on Lance's bike



Status
Not open for further replies.
zzzzzzzzzzzz

"Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Hey, that was just a heads up for those who might want to see Popular Science's take on a cycling.
> Not everybody is as well-informed as you. At least do a little more intelligent critique.
>
> Robert Chambers wrote:
>
> >Yawn
> >
> >"Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >
> >
> >>http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/article/0,12543,462473,00.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
 
gosh, your vocabulary is increasing. there's hope yet!

Robert Chambers wrote:

>zzzzzzzzzzzz
>
>"Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
>
>>Hey, that was just a heads up for those who might want to see Popular Science's take on a cycling.
>>Not everybody is as well-informed as you. At least do a little more intelligent critique.
>>
>>Robert Chambers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yawn
>>>
>>>"Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/article/0,12543,462473,00.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
 
"chris" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Gary <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/article/0,12543,462473,00.html
> Did anybody note the weights of his wheels? 3.75 lbs is a 1700+ gram wheelset. That sucks, and he
> definately ain't riding anything that heavy.

Maybe since he's riding these experimental, lighter frames, he has to have a heavier wheelset.
Really, what's up with that? The Treks as they were can't be all that much heavier than the UCI
6.8kg limit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads