I'm curious at what the saddle height ranges are for people relative to inseam length. Using the old Lemond formula of .883 x inseam seems to put me about 3-4 cm. lower than what seems right for good extension. I've also read that his laid-back position had the saddle nose about 10-11 cm. behind the bottom bracket. Is there a modern trend towards higher seat with less set-back? Or is it just a case of one-size-does-not-fit-all.
So just for grins, post your saddle height (center of BB to top of saddle) and inseam length.
I'm curious at what the saddle height ranges are for people relative to inseam length. Using the old Lemond formula of .883 x inseam seems to put me about 3-4 cm. lower than what seems right for good extension. I've also read that his laid-back position had the saddle nose about 10-11 cm. behind the bottom bracket. Is there a modern trend towards higher seat with less set-back? Or is it just a case of one-size-does-not-fit-all.
So just for grins, post your saddle height (center of BB to top of saddle) and inseam length.
I have mine set so that I can lock out my knees just by pushing my heel toward the ground when I'm locked in the pedal. Although I prefer a squattier more powerful position, my knees have a different opinion. Now I'm practically fully extended at in my downstroke. My knees tracks better and I can ride for hours with no discomfort. FWIW my saddle height is 76cm (center of BB) and my inseam is about 83 (crank length 172.5). Also, I like the saddle set back at least 1 cm past center on a set back seatpost.
For many years I was of the higher is better school, but I now have my saddle lower and further back - instead of the classic plumb-bob from knee directly over pedal spindle, I tend to have my knee around an inch behind.
Works well for me, but this is like lovers - mine might not suit you and vice-versa. Just gotta try a lot till you get the right fit.
