Post your Recipes - with step by step photos



Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> On 14 Dec 2005 21:44:12 GMT, "Default User" <[email protected]>
> wrote:

> > One person claimed the images
> > were not hers or something, but there didn't seem to be any general
> > consensus that linked images were inappropriate for the group.
>
> That person enjoys causing other people pain. I think patches has
> that individual killfiled.

Yeah, that's why I couldn't understand her assertion that the newsgroup
cabal (TINC) disapproved of such images. One loon does not a consensus
make.

Post 'em, don't post 'em, whatever.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
 
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "maxine in ri" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Real people are the kind that you make yourself, not the ones that come
> > in boxes at the store.
>
> You're kidding me, right? You can get People Mix at the store? Well,
> so much for sex!
> --
People Mix in the Crockpot

3 lbs. ribs (beef, pork, or Adam's)
1 box People Mix (I use the organic kind -- less salty, but just as
spicy)
1 can Campbells cream of mushroom soup
1 envelope dried onion soup mix
1 tin anchovies, drained of oil

Place People Mix in bottom of crockpot. Mix remaining ingredients
thoroughly and pour over. Set crockpot to low, cover, turn on, cook
for 12 hours, give a quick stir, leave cover off and cook for 4 more
hours. A family favorite for the holidays. -aem
 
aem wrote:
> Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>> "maxine in ri" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Real people are the kind that you make yourself, not the ones that come
>>>in boxes at the store.
>>
>>You're kidding me, right? You can get People Mix at the store? Well,
>>so much for sex!
>>--
>
> People Mix in the Crockpot
>
> 3 lbs. ribs (beef, pork, or Adam's)
> 1 box People Mix (I use the organic kind -- less salty, but just as
> spicy)
> 1 can Campbells cream of mushroom soup
> 1 envelope dried onion soup mix
> 1 tin anchovies, drained of oil
>
> Place People Mix in bottom of crockpot. Mix remaining ingredients
> thoroughly and pour over. Set crockpot to low, cover, turn on, cook
> for 12 hours, give a quick stir, leave cover off and cook for 4 more
> hours. A family favorite for the holidays. -aem
>

It's much better with a real white sauce and some chopped onions :)

--

saerah

"Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a
disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice."
-Baruch Spinoza

"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear
and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There
is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams
 
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:27:54 -0500, ~patches~
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Get an account with Yahoo, and you can post all the pictures you'd
>>>like, and it's free!
>>
>>Speaking as an *imbicile* exactly what difference would it make if I
>>used tinypic or yahoo?
>
>
> Yahoo keeps all of your pictures together so people can look at them
> anytime they want, instead of searching for tinypic links.
>
>
>>Either way it is posting pic links to a ng that
>>does not appreciate pics of food. Go figure. A newsgroup dedicated to
>>yipping about food doesn't like food pics. Honestly thanks for the tip
>>but it isn't worth my while.
>
>
> I'm not sure why there were complaints about your pictures. I enjoyed
> them. I have a link to my Yahoo picture album at the bottom of each
> of my posts. So does Barb Schaller, and no one has said a word.

There were and some very nasty. I'm glad some enjoyed the pics as I did
enjoy taking them but I won't be sharing here anymore as far as pics go.
I went to lurking for awhile then decided I still liked this ng enough
to post but not for posting pics in any format. It's still a nice ng
once the filters are tweaked ;)
>
> I'm sorry for calling you an imbicile. I was having a bad few days. I
> wish I could take it back, but all I can do is hope that you'll
> forgive me at some point.
>

Damsel, point taken. Many of us have more than a few bad days.
Personally, I try very hard not to share those bad days. If I actually
shared what was going on in my life sometimes, people simply would not
want to believe. Right now we are going through a very hellish time and
we have a funeral tomorrow and, well you know the list goes on. For
that reason alone, when I come to usenet, I try not to share the bad
points, only try to share only the good. You know? You see when I sign
on and post, I never know how the other person's day is going to be but
I sure do hope it isn't going to be worse for anything I post. Have a
good one, even if I am an imbicile ;)
> Carol
 
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> On 14 Dec 2005 21:44:12 GMT, "Default User" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:27:54 -0500, ~patches~
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>Either way it is posting pic links to a ng that
>>>>does not appreciate pics of food. Go figure. A newsgroup
>>>>dedicated to yipping about food doesn't like food pics. Honestly
>>>>thanks for the tip but it isn't worth my while.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure why there were complaints about your pictures. I enjoyed
>>>them. I have a link to my Yahoo picture album at the bottom of each
>>>of my posts. So does Barb Schaller, and no one has said a word.
>>
>>I don't even remember people complaining.
>
>
> I wouldn't mind seeing more of them. I think it would be nice to have
> them grouped in one place, though.
>
>
>>One person claimed the images
>>were not hers or something, but there didn't seem to be any general
>>consensus that linked images were inappropriate for the group.
>
>
> That person enjoys causing other people pain. I think patches has
> that individual killfiled.
>
> Please post again, patches.
>
> Carol


Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
tolerated here. I won't be posting pics through any medium here again.
Besides, it frees up time for me cooking instead of messing with
cameras :)
 
~patches~ wrote:
> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
>> On 14 Dec 2005 21:44:12 GMT, "Default User" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:27:54 -0500, ~patches~
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Either way it is posting pic links to a ng that does not appreciate
>>>>> pics of food. Go figure. A newsgroup
>>>>> dedicated to yipping about food doesn't like food pics. Honestly
>>>>> thanks for the tip but it isn't worth my while.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure why there were complaints about your pictures. I enjoyed
>>>> them. I have a link to my Yahoo picture album at the bottom of each
>>>> of my posts. So does Barb Schaller, and no one has said a word.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't even remember people complaining.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wouldn't mind seeing more of them. I think it would be nice to have
>> them grouped in one place, though.
>>
>>
>>> One person claimed the images
>>> were not hers or something, but there didn't seem to be any general
>>> consensus that linked images were inappropriate for the group.
>>
>>
>>
>> That person enjoys causing other people pain. I think patches has
>> that individual killfiled.
>>
>> Please post again, patches.
>>
>> Carol
>
>
>
> Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
> tolerated here. I won't be posting pics through any medium here again.
> Besides, it frees up time for me cooking instead of messing with
> cameras :)

you are wholly mistaken, patches. As long as you post links, and not
actual pics, it's all good.

--

saerah

"Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a
disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice."
-Baruch Spinoza

"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear
and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There
is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams
 
~patches~ wrote:


> Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
> tolerated here.


Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom?



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
 
There is nothing on that visual recipe site that says anything about
getting a free ringtone. You must have been looking at a banner
advertisement.
 
Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> You're kidding me, right? You can get People Mix at the store? Well,
> so much for sex!
> http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-13-05 - RIP, Gerri

Please don't post pictures of sex...It makes my glasses fog up and then I
trip over things...
 
Default User wrote:

> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
>>tolerated here.
>
>
>
> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom?
>
>
>
> Brian
>
Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never
tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going
back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather funny
that pics are accepted though one source but not another but right now
it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of posting anyway :)
 
~patches~ <[email protected]> looking for trouble wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Default User wrote:
>
>> ~patches~ wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
>>>tolerated here.
>>
>>
>>
>> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom?
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian
>>
> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never
> tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going
> back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather funny
> that pics are accepted though one source but not another but right now
> it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of posting anyway :)

The may be a misconception regarding RFC. RFC is a non binary newsgroup so
posting binaries to this group is a no-no. Posting a link is perfectly
acceptable AFAIK. ABF is a binaries group where people post the actual
pics of the food that they have cooked. I think maybe the confusion you
might be having is non-binary vs. binary newsgroups.

Michael

--
....Bacteria: The rear entrance to a cafeteria.

All gramatical errors and misspellings due to Ramsey the cyber kitten. He
now owns all keyboards and computing devices in the household and has the
final say on what is, or is not, posted.
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
 
~patches~ wrote:

> Default User wrote:

> > Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? Brian
> >
> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never
> tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going
> back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather
> funny that pics are accepted though one source but not another but
> right now it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of
> posting anyway :)

I have no idea what to even google for. I don't recall much outcry from
anyone posting links to images, who would care? Now, attaching images
if bad, of course.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
 
Default User wrote:

> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>
>>Default User wrote:
>
>
>>>Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? Brian
>>>
>>
>>Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never
>>tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going
>>back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather
>>funny that pics are accepted though one source but not another but
>>right now it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of
>>posting anyway :)
>
>
> I have no idea what to even google for. I don't recall much outcry from
> anyone posting links to images, who would care? Now, attaching images
> if bad, of course.
>
>
>
> Brian
>


Well Brian, that is precisely what I thought especially when the image
links were due to food and cooking <shrug> Apparently posting tinypic
links is a problem for some. No problem as it saves me the time and
effort. I could go back and find the posts for you but right now I'm in
between deciding whether to continue posting here or not. Try googling
with my nic and see if you uncover any of the controversy. Pics for the
post part are not really welcomed here and even the links to pics are
not welcomed. Go figure. Oh well, less work for me.
 
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:

> ~patches~ <[email protected]> looking for trouble wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>
>>Default User wrote:
>>
>>
>>>~patches~ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not
>>>>tolerated here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Brian
>>>
>>
>> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never
>>tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going
>>back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather funny
>>that pics are accepted though one source but not another but right now
>>it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of posting anyway :)
>
>
> The may be a misconception regarding RFC. RFC is a non binary newsgroup so
> posting binaries to this group is a no-no. Posting a link is perfectly
> acceptable AFAIK. ABF is a binaries group where people post the actual
> pics of the food that they have cooked. I think maybe the confusion you
> might be having is non-binary vs. binary newsgroups.
>
> Michael
>
No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The
only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click
on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been
around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and
non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic
links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some
here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained
from doing so.
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:00:37 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:24:13 -0500, ~patches~
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks William. I tried that and was shot down by the cabal or whatever
>> you want to call it and reinforced by the tolerated trolls. I figure,
>> why bother? Personally, I like the idea of seeing a food someone cooked
>> especially when accompanied by a recipe. Obviously this is not the ng
>> to post such things. But thankyou for the pointer. Tinypic is really
>> nice for those who don't have access to binary newsgroups.
>
Pandora used a different one recently... don't remember what it was,
but it's not as easy to "F" around with other people's pictures.

>Get an account with Yahoo, and you can post all the pictures you'd
>like, and it's free!
>
Yahoo and the like is ok, but first you have to know where to find
that a particular person's pictures and after you get there the viewer
has to sift through a lot of chaff to get to the wheat, if you know
what I mean.

I like the idea of that web site because it archives a lot of recipes
in categories and it's VISUAL. This is a real service to new cooks.
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:27:54 -0500, ~patches~
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Speaking as an *imbicile* exactly what difference would it make if I
>used tinypic or yahoo? Either way it is posting pic links to a ng that
>does not appreciate pics of food. Go figure. A newsgroup dedicated to
>yipping about food doesn't like food pics. Honestly thanks for the tip
>but it isn't worth my while.

I like pictures, patches! Pandora used a different url to post
pictures a few days ago, but I think that web site has potential. I'm
concerned about some of the periferial items connected with the site,
but the basic idea is a good one.
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:34:07 -0800, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yahoo and the like is ok, but first you have to know where to find
> that a particular person's pictures and after you get there the viewer
> has to sift through a lot of chaff to get to the wheat, if you know
> what I mean.

Huh? Do you have problems trying to view my pictures on Yahoo?

Carol
--

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:21:36 -0500, ~patches~
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Right now we are going through a very hellish time and
>we have a funeral tomorrow and, well you know the list goes on.

Honestly, that isn't a valid excuse. My mother died on Sunday (I was
with her) and her memorial is tomorrow, but hopefully I haven't made a
big deal out of my pain or made anyone here unhappy due to my level of
personal stress.
 
sf wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:21:36 -0500, ~patches~
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Right now we are going through a very hellish time and
>>we have a funeral tomorrow and, well you know the list goes on.
>
>
> Honestly, that isn't a valid excuse. My mother died on Sunday (I was
> with her) and her memorial is tomorrow, but hopefully I haven't made a
> big deal out of my pain or made anyone here unhappy due to my level of
> personal stress.

Yep, agreed. Some here want to make it an excuse and that is up to
them. Others use their pain to say it is ok to be asses. All I was
saying is everyone goes through the pain of life and not everyone makes
that known online. I wasn't using what we are going though as an excuse
by any stretch of the imagination. I'm sorry if you took it as such.
IMO, personal things should remain that way but others should note that
*just* because they are having a bad day doesn't mean others aren't
having a bad day only that they choose not to share they are having a
bad day. There is a lot of personal **** discussed here without regard
to others who may have it worse or just don't want to talk about it
here. We come here to discuss cooking and food, not what ever is going
on in every one's life. While some tid bits add interest other stuff
would be best left out of the newsgroup. One more reason why lurking is
becoming more desireable here ;)
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:08:44 -0500, ~patches~
<[email protected]> wrote:

> IMO, personal things should remain that way but others should note that
> *just* because they are having a bad day doesn't mean others aren't
> having a bad day only that they choose not to share they are having a
> bad day.

I shan't bother you further. Someone who is as emotionally stable and
under control as you are shouldn't be subjected to a loose cannon such
as myself. Bye!

Carol
--

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back