E
Elisa Francesca Roselli
Guest
"the.Mark" wrote:
> I've always wondered how astrologers cope when new planets are discovered
> and considering the relative size of pluto and its distance from Earth how
> come they don't take all the asteroids and other minor bodies into account?
They do, actually. But it depends how "fine grained" an image they want.
Asteroids can mean too much detail.
As for new planets, they're no problem. The consensus is that a new planet is a
new archetype that reveals itself to the collective psyche. For example,
concepts such as Revolution or Radioactivity are historically modern, but
impact heavily on how we screen our consciousness.
EFR
Ile de France
> I've always wondered how astrologers cope when new planets are discovered
> and considering the relative size of pluto and its distance from Earth how
> come they don't take all the asteroids and other minor bodies into account?
They do, actually. But it depends how "fine grained" an image they want.
Asteroids can mean too much detail.
As for new planets, they're no problem. The consensus is that a new planet is a
new archetype that reveals itself to the collective psyche. For example,
concepts such as Revolution or Radioactivity are historically modern, but
impact heavily on how we screen our consciousness.
EFR
Ile de France