B
Bill Z.
Guest
"Tom Kunich" <[email protected]> writes:
> "Bill Z." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Well, that explains a lot. Beside your numerous personal faults, it
> > seems you are also a Bush supporter. You are so igorant that you
> > don't even know that Kerry's position is consistent, although he
> > worded it badly (and the Republicans are playing that for all it is
> > worth rather than talk about the real issues.)
>
> In 2000, Kerry Voted In Favor Of Permanent Normal Trade Relations With
> China. (H.R. 4444, CQ Vote #251: Passed 83-15: R 46-8; D 37-7, 9/19/00,
> Kerry Voted Yea)
>
> Now Kerry Criticizes The Bush Administration For Trading With China.
> "Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said on Monday Americans
> workers were paying the price for President Bush's weak stance on trade with
> China and other countries. . On the bus tour, Kerry singled out the Bush
> administration's handling of trade with China and said that country was
> manipulating its currency." (Caren Bohan, "Kerry Pledges Aggressive Trade
> Stance," Reuters, 4/26/04)
In case you don't know, both are consistent positions. You can be in favor
of normal trade relations with China - treating China the same as other
countries - and still want to make sure that our government looks after
the interests of American workers, not the Bush ruling class.
>
> Yep, now THERE'S consistancy for you.
Yep, it's consistent. I'll ignore the rest of your propaganda - it is
an obvious cut and paste job from the usual right-wing lunatic fringe.
>
> You fwking Liberal idiots just don't know anything at all do you?
Looks like Kunich is a real piece of work, doesn't it. He can't even
spell his favorite word.
--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
> "Bill Z." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Well, that explains a lot. Beside your numerous personal faults, it
> > seems you are also a Bush supporter. You are so igorant that you
> > don't even know that Kerry's position is consistent, although he
> > worded it badly (and the Republicans are playing that for all it is
> > worth rather than talk about the real issues.)
>
> In 2000, Kerry Voted In Favor Of Permanent Normal Trade Relations With
> China. (H.R. 4444, CQ Vote #251: Passed 83-15: R 46-8; D 37-7, 9/19/00,
> Kerry Voted Yea)
>
> Now Kerry Criticizes The Bush Administration For Trading With China.
> "Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said on Monday Americans
> workers were paying the price for President Bush's weak stance on trade with
> China and other countries. . On the bus tour, Kerry singled out the Bush
> administration's handling of trade with China and said that country was
> manipulating its currency." (Caren Bohan, "Kerry Pledges Aggressive Trade
> Stance," Reuters, 4/26/04)
In case you don't know, both are consistent positions. You can be in favor
of normal trade relations with China - treating China the same as other
countries - and still want to make sure that our government looks after
the interests of American workers, not the Bush ruling class.
>
> Yep, now THERE'S consistancy for you.
Yep, it's consistent. I'll ignore the rest of your propaganda - it is
an obvious cut and paste job from the usual right-wing lunatic fringe.
>
> You fwking Liberal idiots just don't know anything at all do you?
Looks like Kunich is a real piece of work, doesn't it. He can't even
spell his favorite word.
--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB