We need not to go to the truble of dipping our toes in the swamp of saying that one side or the other consists of evil people with money grubbing motivations, to me even if true for any or all it is irrelevant. We do need to look at what scientific evidence can be brought to bear in support of either. The homopathitic crowd struggel to bring even a few standard scientifically valid research studies to the table. As the recent mega study shows, even that atempt fails. On the part of the quack buster crowd are thousands of studies published yearly for the same disorders and which show scientiffically valid results. This is why the homopathitic apologists make such a deal about self reported results which are at very best suggestive that it might be useful to consider that something could be going on in some instances, but is certainly not scientific evidence. The bottom line, if and when homopothetic "drugs" can survive standard normal every day standards of scientific evidence and scrutiny, then it might be worth taking a look; but past track records provide little hope for optimism in this regard.