question for jobst brandt



"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> DI Who? wrote:
>> "Andre Jute" wrote
>>> Just my two cents.

>>
>> That's about all it's worth.
>>
>>> Andre Jute

>
> I fixed "DI's" post to show proper attribution.
>
> Note that "DI" is using Micro$oft Outlook Express 6.00 and Andre Jute is
> using Google Groups.
>
> It is becoming increasing clear that the latest Micro$oft email products
> are not compatible with Google Groups, since the quoting attributions are
> often messed up when the Micro$oft user responds to a post made through
> Google Groups.
>

"MFD"
> --
> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
In article <[email protected]>,
Tom Sherman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> > ...
> > If you want to answer a question not asked,...

>
> I will do so if I feel like it.
>
> > Don't *change* the question someone has asked by editing it.
> >

> Does Ozark Bicycle know what an ellipsis is?


You put the ellipsis in with the quoted material
where OB wrote no ellipsis. The ellipsis that you
interpolated belongs outside the quoted line; i.e.
the line beginning with the right angle bracket.

--
Michael Press
 
On Feb 7, 2:16 pm, "Tom Nakashima" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:13:02 -0800 (PST), Ozark Bicycle
> > <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> >>Peter Cole may have thought the other guy "rigid", but I'll wager that
> >>that guy did not forward private emails, unsolicited, to a third party
> >>nor send out nasty snail mails to other posters family members. Fogel
> >>has committed both those foul deeds (I know this from first hand
> >>experience).

>
> This is interesting, what do you mean by 1st hand experience?


If you want more background I believe the following two threads
initiated by Ozark relate directly to these incidents.

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/
a707fddae82a38f2>
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/
df683c12a95a4ab>

--
Dave...
 
On Feb 10, 2:55 am, dkahn400 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2:16 pm, "Tom Nakashima" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:13:02 -0800 (PST), Ozark Bicycle
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > >>Peter Cole may have thought the other guy "rigid", but I'll wager that
> > >>that guy did not forward private emails, unsolicited, to a third party
> > >>nor send out nasty snail mails to other posters family members. Fogel
> > >>has committed both those foul deeds (I know this from first hand
> > >>experience).

>
> > This is interesting, what do you mean by 1st hand experience?

>
> If you want more background I believe the following two threads
> initiated by Ozark relate directly to these incidents.
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/
> a707fddae82a38f2>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/
> df683c12a95a4ab>
>
> --
> Dave...


Thanks for the references, Dave. Reading those sick-making threads
really make one wonder how Carl Fogel came to believe he is the Witch
Hunter General.

I feel for Oz. I have experience of being targeted by exactly Carl
Fogel's sort of smug scum on rec.audio.tubes, a whole gang of them,
using underhand Fogellite methods of character assassination. That is
how I so easily recognized the signs of an underhand plot when Creepy
Carl without provocation put himself in my face.

Andre Jute
Creepbuster
 
On Feb 10, 5:01 am, Andre Jute <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the references, Dave. Reading those sick-making threads
> really make one wonder how Carl Fogel came to believe he is the Witch
> Hunter General.


We each have to draw our own conclusion I guess.

--
Dave...