Quoted message said:
"Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
But anything to do with the human mind itself having
a power is extremely dubious and science hates it.
How can you ever have a control experiment
if everyone on the experiment (let alone the planet)
might be having an effect.And yet at the heart of physics the human mind does
appear to be creating reality: Quantum physics.Can you quote something from Quantum physics which states or implies this?
I'll bet you'll ignore this!I dont know much about the details of Quantum physics
Clearly, you have a gift for understatement. I doubt you know anything other
than the phrase, "Quantum Physics".
Quoted message said:but my understanding is that is that the act
of observing changes the experiment and can be
proven to have done so. This applies to various
sub atomic particles e.g. neutron/positron pairs
that are entangled and take a charge when one
or the other is observed.The is also a famous experiment where you have
a very weak source of photons (say one per minute)
and two slits. And the they still create and
interference pattern. However as soon as you
measure/observe which hole a photo went through
the experiment is changed and intereference
patterns no longer happen.Then there is the uncertainty principle whereby
for example you can accurately measure either
the position OR the velocity of a particle
but not both at once.
Why do you think that is? Do you think that it is because the MIND has
created a new reality for the particle or do you think that perhaps, just
maybe, somehow, someway, something has to interact with the particle in order
that the measurement can be made?
Quoted message said:
The act of observation clearly is changes
the experiment. This statement is so widely accepted
in quantum physics I cant believe you are questioning
it. This has been known for decades.
Perhaps you don't understand what is meant by observation. You seem to think
that it is nothing more than "thinking about it". Observations are only
possible because of something bouncing/reflecting off of the particle in
question. I guess that never occured to you.
Quoted message said:These totally counter-intuitive phenomena are
old had. The question is what constitutes an observer?
*Mathematically*?
The question is, why do you think that "the Human mind does appear to be
creating reality"? I disagree with your (appearant) premise that the human
mind creates reality because particles or waves must collide with a particle
before it can be observed.
Why do you think the Human mind creates External reality?
Quoted message said:
Ship