If I were goint to hit you on the head with a hammer but first I gave you the choice to wear a helmet would you wear it or not?
??? There's a difference between risk and risky. I haven't been hit on the head or threatened with a hammer, to my memory (perhaps I was after all!!), nor does it happen often in the population, I suspect.
Health dollars (e.g. do we immunise against rubella?) are routinely allocated on the basis of benefit/cost, and so are other regulatory measures. Helmet-compulsion legitimately can be evalauted in the same way. But I would like to read the report.
If I were goint to hit you on the head with a hammer but first I gave you the choice to wear a helmet would you wear it or not?
??? There's a difference between risk and risky. I haven't been hit on the head or threatened with a hammer, to my memory (perhaps I was after all!!), nor does it happen often in the population, I suspect.
Health dollars (e.g. do we immunise against rubella?) are routinely allocated on the basis of benefit/cost, and so are other regulatory measures. Helmet-compulsion legitimately can be evalauted in the same way. But I would like to read the report.
Donga
Donga, you're getting trolled by Bratton. It's *blindingly* obvious. Don't play with him, it only makes it worse.
