Re: ****able indian nude girls **** juice stif nipples housewife ****s sensuous w spy fat butts

[N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)]

<[email protected]> wrote in message

[email protected]

Only slightly less off topic than whether or not the WTC towers
should be demolished.

 

[GeekBoy]

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> [email protected]
>
> Only slightly less off topic than whether or not the WTC towers should be
> demolished.
>

Freaking google has become the new AOL for usenet.
Eer since they let open the flood gates all of usenet has been flooded with
spammers, KOOKS, and just plain morons.


>
>

 

[N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)]

Dear GeekBoy:

"GeekBoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Only slightly less off topic than whether or not the WTC
>> towers should be demolished.
>
> Freaking google has become the new AOL for usenet.
> Eer since they let open the flood gates all of usenet has
> been flooded with spammers, KOOKS, and just plain
> morons.

Hard to believe that civilzation can tolerate them, even require
them for something other than a food source, isn't it?

David A. Smith

 

[GeekBoy]

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dear GeekBoy:
>
> "GeekBoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Only slightly less off topic than whether or not the WTC
>>> towers should be demolished.
>>
>> Freaking google has become the new AOL for usenet.
>> Eer since they let open the flood gates all of usenet has
>> been flooded with spammers, KOOKS, and just plain
>> morons.
>
> Hard to believe that civilzation can tolerate them, even require them for
> something other than a food source, isn't it?
>
>

Especially since Congress seriously considered banning AOL users from usenet
back in the 90s.
I wonder if the same can be done about google....Hmmmmm..

 

[John Boy]

GeekBoy wrote:

> Especially since Congress seriously considered banning AOL users from usenet
> back in the 90s.

Citations?

 

[N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)]

Dear John Boy:

"John Boy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> GeekBoy wrote:
>
>> Especially since Congress seriously considered banning AOL
>> users from usenet back in the 90s.
>
> Citations?

I was somewhat surprised myself... I found not quite what was
described, but...
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/01/25/1628233.shtml
http://www.denounce.com/aolblogs.html
http://www.zeropaid.com/news/5065/AOL+to+Drop+Usenet,+Angering+Three+Customers

No, if they let WebTV skate, AOL really isn't a problem.

David A. Smith