Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...



J

Jan

Guest
>Subject: Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...
>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>Date: 4/12/2004 1:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>In article <[email protected]>, Ms. Ilena Rosenthal,
>Director of the possibly-defunct Humantics Foundation for Women and defender
>of
>notorious online anti-semites, posted in her official capacity,

anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,

All buzz words to belittle.

PLONK!
 
Jan wrote:

> anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,
>
> All buzz words to belittle.
>
> PLONK!

You don't get called these things for no reason.
It's because you say things like these. Here is a short
collection of Jan's comments about Jews in recent postings.
I put line breaks between comments made in different postings,
and in some cases removed line breaks when lines appeared
together in the same posting. In some cases I inserted
or removed line breaks to avoid line wrapping. I did not,
however, change or remove parts of any sentences
(as Jan often does, to change their meaning). These
are all complete, original statements made by Jan.

------- begin collection of Jan's comments on Jews -------

Their are Jews here and there are atheists,
(they are the ones who have told the group) with the
exception of IIena, they have proven themselves
to be liars, deceitful and insulters.

Furthmore, I called Andrew Kingoff a Jew Boy when
he posted the stupid blasphemy of the 10 commandments
here on the ng.

That's because most every atheist and jew here
has INDEED lied. They know it,
yet they cover for each other.

The group here are mostly atheists and jews,
(who falsely believe they are enlightened) and need
to have an argument going, thinking they can boast their
ego. They tell lies, twist what is said, and IMHO
are lead by Satan.

The truth is that most debunkers on MHA
who LIE through their tetth, do nothing
but belittle, and are filled with hate, are atheists or jews.

I repeat:
The debubnker's here are atheist or jews.

No, they aren't right, they are greatly deceived
as Eve was when Satan debunked
God's word.
That was the start of debunking.
Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
to debunk his words, and even
debunked his miracles whch happened right
before their eyes.

Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
They debunked all his words and works,
and now debunking and lies are second
nature to them. That is how Satan works.

Most of the debunkers are either atheists or Jews.

It seems the Jews here have taken over this ng,
with their vile false accusations and they are all filled
with hate.

It seems to me the Jews here are trying to get even
for the holocaust. When noone here was in any way
involved.
 
Jan wrote:

> anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,
>
> All buzz words to belittle.
>
> PLONK!

You don't get called these things for no reason.
It's because you say things like these. Here is a short
collection of Jan's comments about Jews in recent postings.
I put line breaks between comments made in different postings,
and in some cases removed line breaks when lines appeared
together in the same posting. In some cases I inserted
or removed line breaks to avoid line wrapping. I did not,
however, change or remove parts of any sentences
(as Jan often does, to change their meaning). These
are all complete, original statements made by Jan.

------- begin collection of Jan's comments on Jews -------

Their are Jews here and there are atheists,
(they are the ones who have told the group) with the
exception of IIena, they have proven themselves
to be liars, deceitful and insulters.

Furthmore, I called Andrew Kingoff a Jew Boy when
he posted the stupid blasphemy of the 10 commandments
here on the ng.

That's because most every atheist and jew here
has INDEED lied. They know it,
yet they cover for each other.

The group here are mostly atheists and jews,
(who falsely believe they are enlightened) and need
to have an argument going, thinking they can boast their
ego. They tell lies, twist what is said, and IMHO
are lead by Satan.

The truth is that most debunkers on MHA
who LIE through their tetth, do nothing
but belittle, and are filled with hate, are atheists or jews.

I repeat:
The debubnker's here are atheist or jews.

No, they aren't right, they are greatly deceived
as Eve was when Satan debunked
God's word.
That was the start of debunking.
Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
to debunk his words, and even
debunked his miracles whch happened right
before their eyes.

Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
They debunked all his words and works,
and now debunking and lies are second
nature to them. That is how Satan works.

Most of the debunkers are either atheists or Jews.

It seems the Jews here have taken over this ng,
with their vile false accusations and they are all filled
with hate.

It seems to me the Jews here are trying to get even
for the holocaust. When noone here was in any way
involved.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Jan says...
>
>>Subject: Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...
>>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>>Date: 4/12/2004 1:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>
>>In article <[email protected]>, Ms. Ilena Rosenthal,
>>Director of the possibly-defunct Humantics Foundation for Women and defender
>>of
>>notorious online anti-semites, posted in her official capacity,
>
>anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,
>
>All buzz words to belittle.

Or, accurate descriptions of you and your behavior online.

>
>PLONK!

How many times have you threatened this, and never carried it out?

I know you've stated that you've PLONKED me before, and it never took. Heck, in
one instance, you plonked me, and then came back and responded to me FOUR
MINUTES LATER!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Lines: 95
X-Admin: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Jan)
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant
Date: 23 Feb 2004 01:58:50 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: OT: Serious Question for Ilena Rosenthal...
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

....

PLONK!
---end message 1---

Lines: 34
X-Admin: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Jan)
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant
Date: 23 Feb 2004 02:02:56 GMT (FOUR MINUTES LATER - AML)
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: OT: Serious Question for Ilena Rosenthal...
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

>Subject: Re: OT: Serious Question for Ilena Rosenthal...
>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>Date: 2/22/2004 7:33 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
---end message 2----

So how long will this PLONKING last?


- Andrew Langer

Any posts by Andrew Langer are his own, written by him, for his own
enjoyment (and the education of others). Unless expressly stated,
they represent his own views, and not those of any other individuals
or entities. He is not, nor has he ever been, paid to post here.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Ilena Rose says...
>
>On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:08:40 GMT, Andrew Langer<[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>How many times have you threatened this, and never carried it out?
>
>
>
>
>How many has
> Corporate Junk Science Flack Andy threatened to SLAPP sue me and
>others

Never. Filing charges against you for _HARASSING_ my wife and making statements
unrelated to substantive issues of debate is not protected expression.
Demanding a retraction for defamatory statements you have made is similarly
outside the scope of public participation.

> ... here's twice ...
>
>www.humanticsfoundation.com/langervsilena.html
>Being updated with Andy's latest assaults

I have never assaulted you. Assault is a legal term, and claiming that I have
assaulted you when I have not is textbook defamation.

I continue to ask that you retract these statements claiming that I have
assaulted you. That you continue to repeat these statements despite my requests
compounds your error.

- Andrew Langer

Any posts by Andrew Langer are his own, written by him, for his own
enjoyment (and the education of others). Unless expressly stated,
they represent his own views, and not those of any other individuals
or entities. He is not, nor has he ever been, paid to post here.
 
>Subject: Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...
>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>Date: 4/13/2004 11:08 AM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>In article <[email protected]>, Jan says...
>>
>>>Subject: Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...
>>>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>>>Date: 4/12/2004 1:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Ms. Ilena
>Rosenthal,
>>>Director of the possibly-defunct Humantics Foundation for Women and
>defender
>>>of
>>>notorious online anti-semites, posted in her official capacity,
>>
>>anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,
>>
>>All buzz words to belittle.
 
>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]

>I have never assaulted you. Assault is a legal term, and claiming that I
>have
>assaulted you when I have not is textbook defamation.

ZZzz.

Jan
 
Andrew Langer<[email protected]> wrote in news:cgUec.1262$H4.16
@www.newsranger.com:

> In article <[email protected]>, Jan says...
>>
>>>Subject: Re: About that EWG Asbestos Report...
>>>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>>>Date: 4/12/2004 1:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Ms. Ilena
Rosenthal,
>>>Director of the possibly-defunct Humantics Foundation for Women and
defender
>>>of
>>>notorious online anti-semites, posted in her official capacity,
>>
>>anti-semite, Nazi girl, racist, fascist,
>>
>>All buzz words to belittle.
>
> Or, accurate descriptions of you and your behavior online.
>
>>
>>PLONK!
>
> How many times have you threatened this, and never carried it out?
>
> I know you've stated that you've PLONKED me before, and it never took.
Heck, in
> one instance, you plonked me, and then came back and responded to me
FOUR
> MINUTES LATER!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>


There is a reason she has earned the nickname of "Lying Ilooney".

y


--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Jan says...
>
>>From: Andrew Langer [email protected]
>
>>I have never assaulted you. Assault is a legal term, and claiming that I
>>have
>>assaulted you when I have not is textbook defamation.
>
>ZZzz.
>

So says the ignorant bigot who doesn't know what textbook defamation is, but
nevertheless demonstrated her stupidity by trying to claim that my insults to
her, based on my opinion of her, which in and of itself was based upon provable
things she'd said and done, is defamation.

- Andrew Langer

Any posts by Andrew Langer are his own, written by him, for his own
enjoyment (and the education of others). Unless expressly stated,
they represent his own views, and not those of any other individuals
or entities. He is not, nor has he ever been, paid to post here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back