M
Matt B
Guest
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 02:59:53 +0100, Lum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>> Blame Beeching - or rather the pro-car Government that handed him his
>>> conclusions and told him to find the supporting data.
>
>>Before my time, I think. I still have no idea who this guy is, presumably
>>a
>>transport minister in a previous government.
>
> He's the one who closed all the branch lines and cross-country links
> whose absence you note. Not a transport minister, a hatchet man.
Are you sure? I think you'll find that there was nearly as much closed
before Beeching became involved as after, and that most of that closed as a
result of Tory appointed Beeching's recommendations were under Labour
governments.
The closures were as a result of the mistaken belief that Britain's railways
could be stopped from haemorrhaging tax payers money, and that the public
_would_ start using them again in preference to personal transport.
--
Matt B
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 02:59:53 +0100, Lum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>> Blame Beeching - or rather the pro-car Government that handed him his
>>> conclusions and told him to find the supporting data.
>
>>Before my time, I think. I still have no idea who this guy is, presumably
>>a
>>transport minister in a previous government.
>
> He's the one who closed all the branch lines and cross-country links
> whose absence you note. Not a transport minister, a hatchet man.
Are you sure? I think you'll find that there was nearly as much closed
before Beeching became involved as after, and that most of that closed as a
result of Tory appointed Beeching's recommendations were under Labour
governments.
The closures were as a result of the mistaken belief that Britain's railways
could be stopped from haemorrhaging tax payers money, and that the public
_would_ start using them again in preference to personal transport.
--
Matt B